PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 17, 2026Nature Chemical Engineering0 citationsOpen Access

Plant-level decarbonization pathways and mitigation costs of global oil refineries

SMShijun MaJMJing MengTLTianyang Lei

Key Points

  • The primary aim is to identify effective decarbonization strategies at the plant level in oil refineries.
  • Developed a decarbonization pathway model for individual refineries.
  • Analyzed the costs of low-carbon technologies specific to refining operations.
  • Examined regional differences in refinery configurations and their impact on mitigation costs.
  • Identified carbon capture and storage as a key mitigation option in China, involving over 60% of costs in deep-conversion refineries.
  • Found that 40% of mitigation costs in the USA are linked to transitioning from steam methane reformers to biomass gasification for hydrogen production.
  • Combining retrofitting with bio-crude oil adoption could lead to negative CO2 emissions.

Abstract

Abstract Oil refining is a major industrial CO 2 emitter and requires rapid decarbonization to align with climate goals. While decarbonization has been widely discussed at national and global levels, successful implementation relies on mitigation options that are technically feasible and economically competitive at individual refineries. Here we develop a plant-level decarbonization pathway model, coupling refinery-specific operating characteristics with dynamic costs of low-carbon technologies. The global refining sector, especially deep conversion refineries, could be substantially decarbonized through carbon capture and storage and clean hydrogen. Regional differences in refinery age and configuration lead to heterogeneous decarbonization pathways. In China, over 60% of mitigation costs in deep-conversion refineries are associated with carbon capture and storage at furnaces and boilers, whereas in the USA, approximately 40% arise from replacing steam methane reformers with biomass gasification for hydrogen production. Combining shorter retrofitting cycles with bio-crude oil adoption would further increase cumulative mitigation and enable negative CO 2 emissions. Our findings identify feasible, cost-effective plant-level mitigation strategies and provide actionable evidence for accelerating climate mitigation.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Ma et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a095b3e7880e6d24efe0f60https://doi.org/10.1038/s44286-026-00394-z
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper