PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 17, 2026IET Electric Power Applications0 citationsOpen Access

Magnetic Equivalent Circuit Modelling for Flux Modulation Axial Flux Permanent Magnet Machine With YASA Topology

View Full Paper
KWKaibo WangLSLingyun ShaoZZZhuoran Zhang

Key Points

  • The aim is to develop a magnetic equivalent circuit model (MECM) for analyzing the FM-YASA machine efficiently.
  • Proposed MECM is 498 times faster than 3D finite element analysis and 3.4 times faster than 2D FE analysis.
  • Refined modelling includes tiny rectangular grids for airgap, permanent magnet, modulation slot, and stator slot opening.
  • Dynamic MECM auto-updates magnetic reluctance connections during rotor rotation.
  • The refined MECM shows high accuracy with errors < 5% compared to finite element analysis and experimental results.
  • Improved torque density and efficiency of FM-YASA machine are confirmed through MECM validation.

Abstract

ABSTRACT By combining the advantage of yokeless and segmented armature (YASA) machine and flux modulation effect, the flux modulation YASA (FM‐YASA) machine exhibits superior torque density and efficiency. The finite element (FE) method is the most accurate way to predict the machine performances. However, it will cause a heavy computational burden. Therefore, a magnetic equivalent circuit model (MECM) is proposed in this paper to analyse the FM‐YASA machine rapidly, which is 498 times faster than three‐dimensional FE analysis and 3.4 times faster than two‐dimensional FE analysis approximately. Compared with traditional lumped‐parameter MECM, the tiny rectangular grids are adopted for the refined modelling of airgap, permanent magnet (PM), modulation slot and stator slot opening. The refined magnetic grids of airgap and PM unify the model to achieve a dynamic MECM which can auto‐update connection of the magnetic reluctance during rotor rotation. Since PM with stepped slots is designed to facilitate assembly and enhance mechanical strength, the leakage flux of PMs is captured accurately by the refined PM model. The effectiveness of the proposed MECM is verified by the FE analysis and experiment, with errors < 5%.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Wang et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a095b5d7880e6d24efe117ahttps://doi.org/10.1049/elp2.70176
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Design, Optimization, and Validation of a Dual Three-Phase YASA Axial Flux Machine with SMC Stator for Aerospace Electromechanical Actuators2025
  2. 2Analytical modeling of coreless stator axial flux permanent magnet machines under no-load condition2025
  3. 3MEC-Based Modeling and Design of Permanent Magnet Synchronous Machines with Axial–Radial Rotor Extensions Using Yoke and Rotor-Side Spaces2025
  4. 4Ultra‐fast finite element analysis of coreless axial flux permanent magnet synchronous machines2024 · 7 citations
  5. 5Performance Analysis of Slotless Axial Flux Permanent Magnet Machines with Skewed Magnets under Loading Condition2024