PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 17, 2026Medical Care0 citations

A Novel Medicare Claims-Based Approach to Identifying Tele-ICU Capability and Utilization Across US Hospitals

View Full Paper
KRKaran RaiAMAnuj MehtaJBJames F. Burke

Key Points

  • To develop a claims-based method to identify tele-ICU capability and evaluate its concordance with AHA data.
  • Retrospective cross-sectional study using 2021 Medicare claims and AHAASD information.
  • Tele-ICU hospitals identified via claims during inpatient and emergency visits, requiring at least one claim.
  • Concordance analysis compared hospitals identified via claims to those reporting capability in the AHAASD.
  • 1193 tele-ICU claims identified from 344 hospitals; 947 out of 3932 AHA respondents reported tele-ICU capability.
  • Claims showed 11.6% sensitivity, 95.0% specificity, and 42.6% positive predictive value compared to AHAASD.
  • Claims-only identified hospitals were more likely to be rural and for-profit with higher ICU resources but fewer intensivists.

Abstract

Background: Tele-ICU adoption has expanded, yet no validated claims-based method exists to identify tele-ICU capability or utilization. Reliance on self-reported survey data limits national assessment of delivery models and outcomes. Objectives: To develop a Medicare claims-based approach to identify tele-ICU capability and utilization, evaluate concordance with the American Hospital Association Annual Survey Database (AHAASD), and describe hospital and patient characteristics. Research Design: Retrospective cross-sectional study using 2021 Medicare 5% Limited Data Set Part A and B claims and the 2021 AHAASD. Tele-ICU-capable hospitals were identified using tele-ICU claims among Medicare beneficiaries during inpatient hospitalizations and emergency department visits and defined as hospitals with ≥1 claim. We compared these hospitals with hospitals reporting tele-ICU capability in the AHAASD. Results: We identified 1193 tele-ICU claims from 344 hospitals. Among 3932 AHA respondents, 947 reported tele-ICU capability; 110 hospitals were identified by both methods. Relative to AHAASD, claims exhibited 11.6% sensitivity, 95.0% specificity, and 42.6% positive predictive value. Most hospitals submitted 1–2 claims, while a minority generated most claims. Compared with tele-ICU hospitals identified by AHAASD, hospitals identified only by claims were more likely to be rural, for-profit, noncritical access, and had more ICU beds and ventilators but fewer intensivists. Among 1,008,106 ICU patients, 680 (0.1%) had tele-ICU claims and demonstrated higher acuity. Conclusions: Tele-ICU claims identify a small, specific subset of hospitals actively billing for tele-ICU care and capture clinically meaningful encounters. Combining claims with survey data may improve national measurement of tele-ICU adoption and inform operational and policy assessments.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Rai et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a095b5d7880e6d24efe1193https://doi.org/10.1097/mlr.0000000000002337
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper