PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 17, 2026Journal of Educational Measurement1 citations

Enacting Culturally Specific Assessment by Constructing a STEM Leadership Assessment Framework

View Full Paper
DSDavid SulABAngelicque Tucker Blackmon

Key Points

  • This research aims to develop a culturally specific assessment framework for STEM leadership at HBCUs, capturing the unique experiences and values of leaders in these institutions.
  • Conducted qualitative analysis of leadership narratives from HBCU presidents, provosts, deans, and professors.
  • Identified six dimensions of STEM leadership reflecting the values and practices of HBCU leadership through collaborative analysis.
  • Established a rigorous instrument development process for constructing a rubric-based assessment tool.
  • Developed a framework with six key dimensions of STEM leadership pertinent to HBCUs.
  • Demonstrated a methodologically rigorous approach to culturally relevant assessment design.
  • Emphasized the importance of epistemic alignment in assessment validity.

Abstract

Abstract This manuscript introduces a culturally specific assessment framework for STEM leadership, developed through qualitative analysis of leadership narratives from presidents, provosts, deans, department chairs, and professors at Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCUs). While grounded in the HBCU context, the framework is designed to guide the future development of a rubric‐based assessment tool, with broader implications for leadership assessment in other culturally specific educational environments. A formal instrument development process was used to ensure that a leadership assessment framework reflected the voices and experiences of HBCU leaders. Through collaborative in‐depth qualitative analyses, six dimensions of STEM leadership were identified that represent the epistemologies, values, and practices embedded in these institutions. While the resulting framework is tailored to the HBCU context, the development process provides a rigorous and transferable approach to assessment design. The methodology repositions validity not as a post hoc adjustment, but as a foundational commitment to epistemic alignment between what is being measured and who is being measured. In doing so, assessment development for culturally specific environments is presented as both methodologically rigorous and conceptually sound.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Sul et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a095b787880e6d24efe12e3https://doi.org/10.1111/jedm.70048
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper