PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 17, 2026Cognitive Therapy and Research0 citationsOpen Access

Initial Development of Group Brief Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Fidelity Assessment Instruments

JBJustin C. BakerSCShannon CainSPSkyler D. Prowten

Key Points

  • This research aims to develop and test fidelity assessment instruments for group cognitive behavioral therapy in suicide prevention.
  • 141 active-duty service members participated, with randomization into G-BCBT and DBT conditions.
  • Developed 12 fidelity assessment instruments for G-BCBT, used by expert raters to evaluate fidelity.
  • Conducted initial field testing to gauge agreement and reliability among raters.
  • High agreement among expert raters, with 86.3% of scores exceeding 85%.
  • Mixed results for inter-rater reliability; perfect scores in some areas but others showing fair to moderate levels.
  • Many inter-rater metrics indicated less than chance agreement, suggesting potential measurement issues.

Abstract

Abstract Purpose Treatment fidelity is important for both research and clinical practice, including adapting new approaches for group delivery of Brief Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (G-BCBT) for suicide prevention. This study describes the initial development and preliminary field test of 12 fidelity assessment instruments (FAIs) for G-BCBT, for use in a non-inferiority trial comparing G-BCBT to Dialectical Behavioral Therapy (DBT) skills group. Method This study included 141 active-duty service members (69 male, 72 female). Participants were randomized to one of two conditions with a total of 10 G-BCBT and 10 DBT group therapy cohorts. Twelve G-BCBT FAIs were developed (one per session) and used by two expert raters to evaluate G-BCBT fidelity. Results Range of percent agreement was high among expert raters, with 86.3% of agreement scores exceeding 85%. Results for inter-rater reliability were mixed with several scores reflecting perfect agreement and others achieving fair to moderate levels of agreement. However, most inter-rater reliability metrics demonstrated less than chance levels of agreement, suggesting possible halo or ceiling effects. Conclusion Initial field testing of G-BCBT FAIs provided mixed support for use. Recommendations to improve FAI use and inter-rater reliability metrics are discussed as well as directions for future research.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Baker et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a095b787880e6d24efe146dhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-026-10749-8
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper