PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 17, 2026Human Psychopharmacology Clinical and Experimental0 citations

Empagliflozin as an Alternative to Metformin for Antipsychotic‐Related Weight Gain: Double‐Blind Randomized Controlled Trial

View Full Paper
ADAtena DolatiDADavoud AhmadimoghaddamMZMaryam Zamanirafe

Key Points

  • This trial evaluates the effectiveness of empagliflozin compared to metformin for managing antipsychotic-induced weight gain.
  • 12-week double-blind randomized controlled trial
  • Participants included 84 adults with schizophrenia or bipolar disorder experiencing weight gain from clozapine or olanzapine
  • Primary outcome was percentage change in body weight; secondary outcomes included BMI and metabolic parameters.
  • Empagliflozin led to greater reductions in triglycerides (TG), fasting insulin, and HOMA-IR compared to metformin (all p < 0.05)
  • Both groups saw significant weight reduction; no significant differences in weight change or adverse effects incidence between groups (p > 0.05)
  • Improvements in metabolic parameters were observed in both treatment groups.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background Weight gain and metabolic disturbances are common adverse effects of antipsychotic medications such as clozapine and olanzapine. Beyond their primary role in glycemic control, sodium‐glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors have been associated with weight loss and improvements in various metabolic parameters. This study compared the efficacy and safety of empagliflozin and metformin in patients with antipsychotic‐induced weight gain (AIWG). Methods In this 12‐week, double‐blind, randomized controlled trial, 84 adults with schizophrenia or bipolar disorder and established weight gain from clozapine or olanzapine were assigned to receive either empagliflozin (10 mg daily) or metformin (1000 mg daily). The primary outcome was the percentage change in body weight from baseline to week 12. Secondary outcomes included changes in absolute body weight, body mass index (BMI), waist circumference, waist‐hip ratio, and the proportion of patients achieving ≥ 5% weight loss. Exploratory outcomes assessed changes in glycemic and lipid parameters, fasting insulin, and insulin resistance (HOMA‐IR). Safety was evaluated by monitoring adverse events, treatment discontinuations, and serious adverse events. Results Of the 84 randomized participants, 38 (90.5%) in the empagliflozin group and 39 (92.9%) in the metformin group completed the 12‐week study. Both treatments produced significant within‐group reductions in anthropometric measures (all p 0.05). Both groups showed improvements in glycemic and lipid parameters, but empagliflozin resulted in significantly greater reductions in TG ( p = 0.004), fasting insulin ( p = 0.005), and HOMA‐IR ( p = 0.012), as well as a greater increase in HDL‐C ( p < 0.001) compared to metformin. The overall incidence of adverse effects was comparable (33.3% vs. 38.1%; p = 0.650), with no serious adverse events reported. Conclusions These findings suggest that empagliflozin is a promising alternative to metformin for managing metabolic complications in patients treated with clozapine or olanzapine. These findings warrant confirmation and further investigation in larger, long‐term studies. Trial registration The trial was registered prospectively at the Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (IRCT) with the ID code IRCT20120215009014N538 on November 12, 2024

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Dolati et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a095b8e7880e6d24efe14d2https://doi.org/10.1002/hup.70047
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper