Measuring thoracic aortic pulse wave velocity over 10 beats using the Echo-Doppler method produced the lowest variability and high reproducibility (intra-reviewer ICC 0.978).
Observational (n=39)
What is the optimal number of beats to measure to minimize variability of Echo-Doppler derived aortic pulse wave velocity in pediatric patients?
Measuring aortic pulse wave velocity over 10 beats using the Echo-Doppler method provides the lowest variability and high reproducibility in pediatric patients.
AbstractBACKGROUND Pulse wave velocity (PWV) is an indirect measure of elastic arterial stiffness. While various methods have been established to measure PWV, the Echo-Doppler method for measuring thoracic aortic PWV (a-PWV) is a highly available and cost-effective technique within the cardiology clinic. The purpose of this study was to assess the variability of a-PWV using the Echo-Doppler method, and to identify the optimal number of measurements providing the least variability of a-PWV in pediatric patients and healthy controls. METHODS Eighteen patients with a dilated proximal aorta and 21 healthy controls with a normal-sized proximal aorta (10–18 years) were evaluated. Imaging was performed in four studies across two visits. Variability Comparisons were performed for short-term, medium-term, intra-reviewer, inter-reviewer, and inter-sonographer variability and analyzed via intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland-Altman plots. RESULTS The ICCs were highest for 10 beats. The combined group ICCs for the variability comparisons for 10 beats were: short-term (0.743); medium-term (0.723) intra-reviewer (0.978), inter-reviewer (0.729) and inter-sonographer (0.823). Bland-Altman plots showed good agreement for all variability comparisons. CONCLUSIONS This study has established that the measurement over 10 beats produces the lowest variability and is recommended when assessing a-PWV in both patients with a dilated proximal aorta and controls. Further, reproducibility remains high, even when accounting for sources of measurement variation, such as differences between sonographers, reviewers, and study visits.
Massarotto et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Dilated proximal aorta (n=39). Echo-Doppler method for measuring thoracic aortic pulse wave velocity was evaluated on Variability of a-PWV (short-term, medium-term, intra-reviewer, inter-reviewer, and inter-sonographer). Measuring thoracic aortic pulse wave velocity over 10 beats using the Echo-Doppler method produced the lowest variability and high reproducibility (intra-reviewer ICC 0.978).