PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 17, 2026Prosthetics and Orthotics International0 citations

International prosthetists' perspectives on adjustable-volume lower limb prosthetic sockets

View Full Paper
MKMartin P. KilbaneJWJeffrey WensmanAGAnthony R. Gutierrez

Key Points

  • This study aims to explore global experiences of prosthetists regarding adjustable-volume prosthetic sockets and their effectiveness across different patient profiles.
  • An online survey was distributed globally to prosthetists about adjustable sockets.
  • Statistical comparisons were made between US and non-US respondents.
  • Responses included experiences, challenges, and patient selection factors.
  • 66.7% of valid responses came from the US, with 85% having fitted an adjustable socket (p = 0.001).
  • Success rates ranged from 40.0% to 75.1%, with no significant differences across respondent groups.
  • Feedback emphasized the need for careful patient selection and the timing of socket use.

Abstract

Background: Adjustable-volume prosthetic sockets are designed to address residual limb volume fluctuations that temporarily alter socket fit. These systems are relatively new to the market and their global use, and the type of patient they work best for, remains unclear. Objective: This study explored global experiences and perspectives on fitting different styles of commercially available adjustable-volume prosthetic sockets. Methods: An online survey was distributed globally to prosthetists. The survey asked about experiences with adjustable sockets, including successes, challenges, and barriers faced when fitting, and the impact of amputation level on success. Responses were statistically compared between United States (US) and non-US respondents. Results: Of 195 valid responses, 66.7% were from the US. Eighty-five percent of respondents had fit an adjustable socket, with those in the US more likely to fit them than those outside of the US ( p = 0.001). Reported success rates ranged from 40.0% to 75.1% depending on the socket style, with no significant differences between US and non-US respondents or between amputation levels. Open-ended feedback highlighted the importance of patient selection, the timing of use, and differing views on the implications of prefabricated designs for clinical practice and access to care. Conclusions: Globally, prosthetists report moderate success in fitting a variety of lower limb adjustable-volume sockets at different levels of amputation. As the market for adjustable-volume sockets continues to expand, further research is warranted to evaluate long-term outcomes across styles and amputation levels to better inform global prescription practices.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kilbane et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a095ba67880e6d24efe1832https://doi.org/10.1097/pxr.0000000000000533
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1A Survey of Prosthetists' Perspectives on Adjustable-Volume Lower-Limb Prosthetic Sockets2021 · 34 citations
  2. 2Fluctuating residual limb volume accommodated with an adjustable, modular socket design2016 · 18 citations
  3. 3Regulation of the global orthotist/prosthetist workforce, and what we might learn from allied health professions with international-level regulatory support: a narrative review2021 · 16 citations
  4. 4Survey of Individuals Wearing Lower Limb Prostheses2010 · 8 citations
  5. 5Use and Satisfaction with Prosthetic Devices Among Persons with Trauma-Related Amputations2001 · 386 citations