PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 17, 2026Physics of Fluids0 citationsOpen Access

Phase-locked characterization of intraglottal flow separation vortices and medial surface motion during phonation

View Full Paper
JMJacob Michaud-DorkoCLCharles Farbos de LuzanGDGregory R. Dion

Key Points

  • To characterize vocal fold vibration and glottal geometry across different coronal planes in canine larynges during phonation.
  • Used multi-plane phase locked two-dimensional particle image velocimetry
  • Studied excised canine larynges
  • Reconstructed medial glottal wall geometry and intraglottal flow fields across coronal planes.
  • Significant variation in glottal shape and flow dynamics noted, with larger openings in mid-coronal and anterior planes.
  • Flow separation vortices formed during closure, varying in size and location based on coronal position.
  • Stronger flow dynamics, higher circulation, and more pronounced skewing observed in anterior regions compared to posterior.

Abstract

This study investigates vocal fold vibration by characterizing glottal geometry and aerodynamic properties at different coronal planes along the posterior to anterior axis in excised canine larynges. Multi-plane, phase locked two-dimensional (2D) particle image velocimetry was used to reconstruct the medial glottal wall geometry and intraglottal flow fields across equidistant coronal planes during phonation. The results reveal significant spatial variation in glottal shape and flow dynamics, with larger glottal openings and divergence angles observed in the mid-coronal and anterior planes compared to the posterior plane. Flow separation vortices (FSV) consistently formed along the medial glottal wall during the closing phase but varied in size and location depending on coronal position. In the mid-coronal and anterior regions, FSV formed closer to the inferior edge and produced stronger flow entrainment, higher circulation, and greater negative gauge pressures, leading to more pronounced flow skewing during closure. In contrast, FSV in the posterior region formed near the superior aspect, exhibited weaker entrainment and circulation, and resulted in less pronounced glottal skewing. These findings highlight fluid structure interactions within the glottis and underscore the importance of considering the posterior to anterior variations to improve our understanding of voice production mechanisms.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Michaud-Dorko et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a095c037880e6d24efe1f7ehttps://doi.org/10.1063/5.0291498
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper