What does this research mean for the field?

Governance and social participation in sustainable mobility across Latin American knowledge territories exhibit varying degrees of integration, and are hindered by persistent challenges such as weak institutionalization of citizen participation, insufficient disincentives for private car use, and a lack of data governance. Novelty: ClaimNovelty.INCREMENTAL. Consensus alignment: ConsensusAlignment.NEUTRAL.

What question did this study set out to answer?

This study aims to analyze how governance and social participation influence sustainable mobility initiatives in urban Latin America.

May 17, 2026SustainabilityOpen Access

Urban Circularity and Knowledge Territories in Latin America: Governance and Social Participation in Sustainable Mobility

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Authors

SSSilvia Stuchi MNMarcela Noronha DADenis dos Santos Alves

Discussion

Member takes

Overview

Comparative analysis reveals governance models and social participation affecting sustainable mobility in Latin America.

Key Points

This study aims to analyze how governance and social participation influence sustainable mobility initiatives in urban Latin America.
Qualitative exploratory case study approach
Data collected from field visits and secondary sources including legislation and reports
Comparative framework integrating KBUD and urban circularity principles
Distritotec features a multistakeholder governance model and effective community-led mobility initiatives.
Parque Patricios demonstrates fragmented relationships between infrastructure improvements and participatory planning.
Porto Digital shows limited integration between innovation policies and mobility, exhibiting centralized governance.

Cite This Study

Stuchi et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a095c037880e6d24efe1fb8 https://doi.org/10.3390/su18104888

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

May 17, 2026SustainabilityOpen Access

Urban Circularity and Knowledge Territories in Latin America: Governance and Social Participation in Sustainable Mobility

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Authors

SSSilvia Stuchi MNMarcela Noronha DADenis dos Santos Alves

Discussion

Member takes

Overview

Comparative analysis reveals governance models and social participation affecting sustainable mobility in Latin America.

Key Points

This study aims to analyze how governance and social participation influence sustainable mobility initiatives in urban Latin America.
Qualitative exploratory case study approach
Data collected from field visits and secondary sources including legislation and reports
Comparative framework integrating KBUD and urban circularity principles
Distritotec features a multistakeholder governance model and effective community-led mobility initiatives.
Parque Patricios demonstrates fragmented relationships between infrastructure improvements and participatory planning.
Porto Digital shows limited integration between innovation policies and mobility, exhibiting centralized governance.

Cite This Study

Stuchi et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a095c037880e6d24efe1fb8 https://doi.org/10.3390/su18104888

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark