PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 17, 2026Journal of Genetic Counseling0 citations

Genetic counseling assistant‐led education supports efficiency in rare disease care

View Full Paper
LDLaura DuncanJBJessa BidwellKTKayla Troe

Key Points

  • To assess the impact of genetic counseling assistant (GCA) pretest education on appointment time and patient inquiries in rare disease care.
  • Pilot study conducted at Mayo Clinic's Genetic Testing and Counseling Clinic (GTAC).
  • GCAs provided pretest education focusing on genetics concepts and testing details after training.
  • Data analysis utilized descriptive statistics and two-sided t-tests comparing GCA-education and control groups.
  • GCA-led education reduced GC appointment time by an average of 11.2 minutes (p < 0.0001).
  • 72.7% of patient questions directed to GCAs were outside GCA's scope of knowledge.
  • 63.2% of patients repeated questions to both GC and GCA.

Abstract

Genetic counseling assistants (GCAs) support genetic counselors (GCs) and genetics clinic workflows, but their potential roles in pretest genetic counseling for rare diseases have not been explored. A pilot within the Mayo Clinic Center for Individualized Medicine's Genetic Testing and Counseling Clinic (GTAC), which offers predefined tests for patients with rare disease, explored the impact of GCA pretest education on appointment time and patient questions. After training, GCAs met GTAC patients prior to the GC to provide scripted information on genetics concepts, the visit purpose, and the test including result types and disclosure plans. Data from the pilot and a control group were collected and analyzed using descriptive statistics and two-sided t-tests. Patient cohort characteristics did not differ between the two models. When a GCA provided pretest education, the GC spent an average of 11.2 minutes less with the patient during their session compared to visits completed solely by the GC (p < 0.0001). Total appointment time was not impacted by GCA education. Questions asked to GCAs were often not within GCA scope to answer (72.7%), and some patients asked repetitive questions to both the GC and GCA (63.2%). Reduction in GC time per patient could lead to increased accessibility by allowing additional patients to be seen in a day. Similar models may support GCA professional development while allowing GCs to remove repetitive education from their genetic counseling sessions, leading to less burnout and/or increased job satisfaction. Impact on administrative workflows, access, revenue, patient satisfaction and outcomes and GC/GCA satisfaction and benefits can continue to be explored when trialing models incorporating GCAs in pretest education roles.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Duncan et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a095c037880e6d24efe1fd0https://doi.org/10.1002/jgc4.70220
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper