PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 17, 20260 citations

Can a single supernova remnant account for the gamma-ray emission of G106.3+2.7?

View Full Paper
PCP. CristofariGEG. EmeryTVT. Lubrano di Vavaria

Key Points

  • To evaluate whether a single supernova remnant can explain the gamma-ray emission observed in G106.3+2.7.
  • Utilized analytical modeling of shock dynamics in a clumpy environment.
  • Analyzed gamma-ray observations in the head and tail regions of G106.3+2.7.
  • Explored the association between emissions and potential pulsar influence.
  • TeV gamma-ray emissions observed in the head and tail are compatible with a single SNR hypothesis.
  • Emission spectrum hardens due to expansion into a clumpy medium, supporting the model.
  • Challenges remain in reconciling broadband gamma-ray emissions with standard SNR characteristics.

Abstract

The supernova remnant (SNR) G106.3+2.7 is a complex TeV emitting source whose emission is still poorly understood. There have been numerous discussions on its potential of being a SNR PeVatron since its gamma-ray spectra do not seem to exhibit any significant suppression in the multi-TeV range, up to ∼ 600 TeV, thereby indicating the presence of ∼ PeV particles. We studied the hypothesis in which an SNR evolving in a clumpy or cloudy environment powers the TeV gamma-ray emission detected mainly from two regions, the "head" and the "tail." We discuss the implications of such an hypothesis. We relied on simple physically motivated analytical modeling of the shock dynamics and of the content of accelerated particles and confronted it to available gamma-ray observations. We find that the current observed TeV gamma-ray emission in the head and tail regions can be accounted for by a single active SNR, with a natural hardening of the spectrum due expansion into a clumpy medium or escaping to a dense region in the tail. However, in all scenarios the broadband gamma-ray emission from the GeV range to the ≳ 100 TeV range is difficult to reconcile with a standard SNR, whether originating from a thermonuclear or a core-collapse supernova, and it instead points toward an association with the pulsar.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Cristofari et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a095c147880e6d24efe2145https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202658874/pdf
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Evidence for hybrid gamma-ray emission from the supernova remnant G150.3+4.52024
  2. 2Testing the Molecular Cloud Paradigm for Ultra-High-Energy Gamma Ray Emission from the Direction of SNR G106.3+2.72024
  3. 3Evidence for hybrid gamma-ray emission from the supernova remnant G150.3+4.52024 · 1 citations
  4. 4Testing the molecular cloud paradigm for ultra-high-energy gamma ray emission from the direction of SNR G106.3+2.72024 · 1 citations
  5. 5X-ray counterpart detection and <i>γ</i>-ray analysis of the supernova remnant G279.0+01.1 with eROSITA and <i>Fermi</i>-LAT2024