Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
This paper extends the agent-aware IAM framework (Hayagreevan, Steinacker, 2026) by introducing purpose and intent as two formally distinct, complementary governance dimensions for agentic AI. It proposes eight definitions that precisely distinguish purpose - a declared, lifecycle-governed attribute of an agent's digital identity - from intent - an inferred, session-scoped runtime signal. Two new governance constructs are introduced: the purpose path, a directed auditable record of purpose transitions over the agent's lifetime, and a two-level governance architecture connecting identity governance to runtime authorization through the containment constraint and the permission compatibility check. For multi-agent systems, a recursive containment constraint is introduced requiring both a purpose chain requirement and an intent alignment requirement to hold simultaneously. The framework maps directly to EU AI Act (Articles 9, 13, 14, 19) and GDPR (Article 5(1)(b)) obligations. Seven open research problems are identified, with the granularity problem as the most immediately consequential for implementation.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Steinacker et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/6a095c2c7880e6d24efe2307 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20210493
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:
Angelika Steinacker
Hari Hayagreevan
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...