PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 17, 2026Food Science & Nutrition0 citationsOpen Access

Association of Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension Diet With the Risk of Osteoporosis and Fracture: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis

View Full Paper
BYBin YangJHJiaojiao HouXSXin Song

Key Points

  • To examine the connection between adherence to the DASH diet and the risk of osteoporosis and fracture.
  • Systematic review and meta-analysis of literature from multiple databases including PubMed and Embase from inception to September 2024.
  • Included eight studies: six cross-sectional and two cohort studies with a total of 218,745 individuals.
  • Data extraction and risk of bias assessed by two independent authors.
  • DASH diet adherence was not significantly associated with overall bone health.
  • Higher levels of bone mineral density (BMD) were found in women (p<0.01, 95% CI 0.02–0.03) and individuals above 60 years (p<0.01, 95% CI 0.01–0.03) who adhered to the DASH diet.
  • The study suggests the need for large-scale prospective cohort studies to validate findings.

Abstract

ABSTRACT This systematic review and meta‐analysis aim to investigate the association between DASH diet and risk of osteoporosis and fracture. A comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed, Ovid Embase, Scopus, Web of Science Core Collection and Ovid Medline databases from inception to September 2024. Two authors performed data extraction independently and assessed the risk of bias. After a systemic search, we included a total of eight eligible studies. The six cross‐sectional studies involved 17,683 individuals while the two cohort studies involved 201,062 individuals. Overall, adherence to DASH diet was not significantly associated with bone health. However, subgroup analyses revealed that adherence to DASH diet was associated with a higher level of BMD in women ( = 0.02, 95% CI = 0.02–0.03, p < ; = 0%; 0.01) and individuals aged above 60 years ( = 0.02, 95% CI = 0.01–0.03, 0.01; = 61%; 0.01). Large‐scale prospective cohort studies are needed to validate our findings. Trail registration: PROSPERO number: CRD42024588891

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Yang et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a095c2c7880e6d24efe2396https://doi.org/10.1002/fsn3.71892
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper