PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 17, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Fully Automatable Relative Binding Free Energy Calculations with Enhanced Sampling using FAST/MBAR

View Full Paper
MSMiroslav SuruzhonJRJustina RatkeviciuteKAKhaled Abdel-Maksoud

Key Points

  • This work aims to enhance alchemical free energy (AFE) calculations using an adaptive sampling algorithm for better efficiency and accuracy.
  • Developed a version of the simulated tempering algorithm (FAST) for AFE calculations.
  • Applied enhanced sampling techniques to target specific degrees of freedom.
  • Compared traditional AFE methods like free energy perturbation (FEP).
  • Enhanced sampling increases the mobility of targeted degrees of freedom but reduces sampling efficiency over λ space.
  • Both FAST and FAST/MBAR show robust performance in exploring nanosecond events, such as torsional rotation.
  • FAST/MBAR proves to be a competitive alternative to traditional AFE methods with its black-box nature.

Abstract

AFE (alchemical free energy) calculations are a useful tool in computational drug discovery. However, they typically involve relatively short (<10 ns) simulations, meaning that the initial coordinates and, more generally, the setup of the system have a significant effect on the obtained free energy values. To remedy this, we recently developed a fully adaptive version of the simulated tempering algorithm (FAST) and applied it in the context of sampling. In this work, we extend FAST to AFE calculations with and without enhanced sampling of a particular degree of freedom of interest (FAST/MBAR). We show that enhanced sampling significantly increases the mobility of the targeted degree of freedom at the cost of reduced sampling efficiency over λ space. On the other hand, the free energy calculations without explicit targeting of certain degrees of freedom retain initial-coordinate bias over longer timescales. Despite this, both protocols readily explore nanosecond-timescale events, such as torsional rotation, due to the single-trajectory nature of FAST, making them less sensitive to the system preparation. It is shown that the robust black-box nature of FAST/MBAR makes it a competitive alternative to more traditional AFE methods, such as FEP (free energy perturbation).

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Suruzhon et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a095c2c7880e6d24efe23c6https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20087019
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Fully Automatable Relative Binding Free Energy Calculations with Enhanced Sampling Using FAST/MBAR2026
  2. 2Automated Adaptive Absolute Binding FreeEnergy Calculations2024 · 3 citations
  3. 3Automated Adaptive Absolute Binding Free Energy Calculations2024 · 22 citations
  4. 4Enhancing Relative Binding Free Energy Calculation with Grand Canonical Monte Carlo, Water-swap Monte Carlo, Terminal-flip Monte Carlo and Replica Exchange Solute Tempering2026 · 1 citations
  5. 5Terminal-Flip Monte Carlo: Accelerating the Convergence of Molecular Dynamics and Alchemical Free Energy Calculations2026 · 1 citations