PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 17, 2026Biotropica0 citationsOpen Access

Host Specificity and Activity Synchronization Drive Frog‐Biting Midge Incidence on Torrent Frogs (Hylodidae)

View Full Paper
FSFilipe C. SerranoJDJuan C. Diaz-RicaurteMGMarília P. Gaiarsa

Key Points

  • The study aims to understand the target selection and feeding patterns of frog-biting midges on diurnal frogs in Brazil's Atlantic Forest.
  • Examined micropredation by midges on Hylodes asper and H. phyllodes.
  • Recorded midges' host selection based on species and sex.
  • Analyzed spatial and temporal patterns of micropredation in relation to environmental factors.
  • Midges exclusively targeted H. asper, with males being more frequently attacked while calling.
  • Higher midge abundance noted on females, despite males' greater targeting.
  • Midge activity exhibited a strict diurnal pattern, influenced by precipitation and temperature.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Frog‐bitting midges (Corethrellidae) are widespread micropredators that feed on frog blood. Furthermore, frog‐biting midges may carry pathogens, an important cause of worldwide amphibian declines. Female midges usually target calling male frogs by using acoustic cues. However, how midges target frogs that use conspicuous visual cues, especially diurnal species, is still poorly understood. We explored micropredation by corethrellid midges on two syntopic diurnal frogs, Hylodes asper and H. phyllodes , in Brazil's Atlantic Forest. We tested host selection (species and sex) as well as the spatial and temporal patterns of micropredation. Midges were recorded exclusively on H. asper , indicating host preference, potentially linked to acoustic parameters preferred by midges. Males were more frequently targeted, particularly those calling near the main current of the streams. Yet, midge abundance per individual did not differ between sexes, with unusual high abundance on females. Midges concentrated on the nostrils and gular region, likely due to higher vascularization. Midge activity was strictly diurnal, despite frogs being available at night while resting exposed on vegetation. Micropredation is likely influenced by precipitation, especially under high maximum temperatures. These patterns suggest that both host traits and environmental conditions shape micropredation dynamics for frogs that use visual cues. Considering that midge hematophagy can impose direct physiological costs, as well as carry pathogens, micropredation could significantly impact fitness at the population level. This may be particularly critical for H. asper , which has rapid annual turnover and documented susceptibility to pathogens, which highlights the importance of integrating behavior and environmental factors into midge‐frog interactions.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Serrano et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a095c5d7880e6d24efe2673https://doi.org/10.1111/btp.70208
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper