PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 17, 2026Journal of Materials Research and Technology0 citationsOpen Access

Mechanical response, macro and micro fracture characteristics of jointed rock under true triaxial lateral unloading- axial loading condition

View Full Paper
HLHanxiang LiuYYYong YuanHJHongwen Jing

Key Points

  • This research examines how joint properties like roughness and inclination angle affect the mechanical behavior of jointed rock under specific loading conditions.
  • Conducted true triaxial lateral unloading-axial loading tests on jointed rock samples with varied joint properties.
  • Analyzed stress-strain responses and failure modes based on joint thickness and angle.
  • Utilized CT analysis to observe the morphology and propagation paths of cracks.
  • Under lateral unloading, post-peak stress-strain responses drop significantly due to reduced lateral confinement stress.
  • Peak maximum principal stress is higher for specimens with joint strike parallel to the second principal stress compared to the third.
  • Fracture volume varies greatly with joint inclination angle, reaching 4064 mm³ to 9089 mm³ for specific joint conditions.

Abstract

True triaxial lateral unloading-axial loading (LU-AL) tests were conducted to study the effect of joint properties, including joint roughness coefficient (JRC), strike, inclination angle ( α ) on the mechanical characteristics of jointed rock. Under LU-AL conditions, the disappearance of lateral confinement stress perpendicular to the joint strike ( σ D ) intensifies the weakening effect of joint, leading to obvious post-peak drops in stress-strain responses. After lateral unloading process, the stress parallel to the joint strike becomes the new intermediate principal stress. That leads to the peak maximum principal stress ( σ 1m ) of specimens with joint strike parallelling to σ 2 (FX2 strike) is higher than that of specimens with joint strike parallelling to σ 3 (FX3 strike). As σ D decreases, the influence of JRC and α on failure modes becomes more evident. For jointed rock with α = 45° and 60°, mixed joint shear slip combined with matrix tensile splitting occurs, while a mixture of matrix shear and splitting governs the failure for jointed rock with α = 30° and 90°. The CT analysis further reveals that joint morphology redirects and hinders the propagation of matrix cracks, altering their spatial distribution and development paths. Fracture volume show significant variation with α , taking specimens in FX2 strike with JRC = 14.74 as example, the fracture volumes ranged from 4064 mm 3 to 9089 mm 3 with increasing α . These findings provide new insights into the coupled effects of joint properties and unloading conditions on the crack evolution of jointed rock.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Liu et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a095c6d7880e6d24efe283chttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2026.05.134
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper