PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 17, 2026Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence0 citationsOpen Access

Bewilderment in the Philosophy of Rights: A Reply to Ewers

View Full Paper
MKMatthew H. Kramer

Key Points

  • This response aims to clarify and defend my philosophical view on claim-rights against Ewers's critiques.
  • Engagement with Ewers's critique presented in a philosophical journal.
  • Defense against misrepresentations found in Ewers’s article.
  • Clarified my philosophical perspective on claim-rights.
  • Countered specific arguments made by Ewers regarding misunderstandings.

Abstract

Abstract Simon Franz Ewers, in the pages of this journal, has recently undertaken a critique of my philosophical account of the holding of claim-rights. In this short response to Ewers, I defend that account against some significant misrepresentations or misapprehensions in Ewers’s article.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Matthew H. Kramer (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a095c6d7880e6d24efe2853https://doi.org/10.1017/cjlj.2026.10066
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper