PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 17, 2026International Journal of Damage Mechanics0 citations

Thermal–fluid–structure interaction (Thermal-FSI) analysis of radial–axial steam-turbine stage design considering observed failures

View Full Paper
MBMateusz BrykJBJanusz BadurPZP. Ziółkowski

Key Points

  • This research aims to investigate the mechanical failure mechanisms in radial–axial steam turbine stages during frequent operational cycles.
  • Thermal–fluid–structure interaction analysis conducted on St12T steel blades
  • Structural model accounts for frictional contact between blade and casing
  • Simulations performed during specific transient operational phases
  • High risk of blade interference observed during specific transient phases
  • Significant stress concentrations found at the blade-root transition
  • Mechanically plausible damage mechanism supported under flexible operational conditions

Abstract

Variable renewable generation forces coal-fired steam turbines to operate in frequent start-up/shut-down cycles. This operating mode exposes hot-section components to steep thermal gradients and transient mechanical loads. Reports from a European unit with a radial–axial stage described blade jamming in casing grooves. They also reported fatigue cracks at the blade root during repeated start-up and shut-down events. This study examines whether a similar mechanism could occur in a high-pressure turbine radial–axial stage retrofitted at the Bełchatów Power Plant. A thermal–fluid–structure interaction analysis was performed for a blade made of St12T steel. The structural model included frictional blade–casing contact and clearance cancellation. The results show that the highest risk of interference occurs during specific transient phases. They also show stress concentrations at the blade-root transition, which supports the jamming-induced bending hypothesis. The results indicate that this damage mechanism is mechanically plausible under flexible operation. Possible mitigation measures include reinforcement of the root and fillet, optimization of clearances and fit, and temperature-based monitoring during operation.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Bryk et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a095c6d7880e6d24efe2865https://doi.org/10.1177/10567895261445236
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Conjugate Heat Transfer Simulation of High-Pressure Cooling Blade Under Rotational Conditions in a Gas Turbine2024 · 1 citations
  2. 2Analysis of the Causes of Root Cracks in Low-Pressure Rotor Blades2025
  3. 3Thermal and Structural-Mechanical Modeling and Optimization of a Transiently Operated Steam Turbine Using the FE Method2024
  4. 4Rotor–Stator Interaction-Induced Pressure Pulsation Propagation and Dynamic Stress Response in an Ultra-High-Head Pump-Turbine2026 · 2 citations
  5. 5Experimental Investigation of the Sensitivity of Forced Response to Cold Streaks in an Axial Turbine2024 · 1 citations