PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 18, 2026Frontiers in Psychology0 citationsOpen Access

Chemotherapy-related cognitive impairment as a crisis of the self: a Winnicottian psycho-oncological perspective

View Full Paper
SKSun Mie KangJKJin Su Kim

Key Points

  • This paper aims to reconceptualize CRCI by exploring its impact on self-experience and identity through a psycho-oncological perspective.
  • Synthesized Winnicottian concepts including True Self, False Self, holding, and play.
  • Developed a conceptual model linking cognitive dysfunction to disruptions in selfhood and relational safety.
  • CRCI disrupts the continuity of the True Self, particularly in survivors with strong cognitive identity.
  • Cognitive unreliability leads to intensified False Self functioning, including vigilance and concealment.
  • Recovery is framed as restoring a supportive holding environment for authentic self-experience, beyond cognitive remediation.

Abstract

Objective Chemotherapy-related cognitive impairment (CRCI) is typically conceptualized as a neurocognitive side effect of cancer treatment, with emotional distress framed as a secondary or reactive consequence. This paper aimed to reconceptualize CRCI from a psycho-oncological perspective by examining how acquired cognitive unreliability disrupts self-experience, identity, and continuity of being, using Donald W. Winnicott’s theory of the self and environment. Methods This theoretical paper synthesized Winnicottian concepts—including the True Self, False Self, holding, and play—to develop a conceptual model of CRCI that links cognitive dysfunction to disruptions in selfhood and relational safety. Results CRCI is conceptualized as a potential disruption of the continuity of the True Self in a subset of survivors, particularly those whose premorbid identity was strongly organized around cognitive functioning. Within this framework, cognitive unreliability is interpreted as threatening self-continuity, with adaptive responses taking the form of intensified False Self functioning, including vigilance, over-adaptation, and concealment. While these strategies may preserve external functioning, they constrain spontaneity, vitality, and the capacity for play. Recovery is therefore reframed not as cognitive restoration alone, but as the re-establishment of a holding environment that supports the gradual re-emergence of authentic self-experience. Conclusion Within this framework, addressing CRCI is not limited to cognitive remediation, but extends to the relational conditions that support the continuity of the self and the possibility of authentic lived experience in a subset of survivors.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kang et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0aabc25ba8ef6d83b6f7c3https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1811745
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Deciphering transcriptomic changes in chemobrain: a comprehensive review2025 · 2 citations
  2. 2Self-Reported Cancer-Related Cognitive Impairment in Patients With Breast Cancer Is Associated With Potassium Channel Gene Polymorphisms2024 · 2 citations
  3. 3Neuroimaging studies of cognitive dysfunction following cancer and treatment2025 · 6 citations
  4. 4Exploring primary breast cancer survivors' self‐management of sustained cancer‐related cognitive impairment in the workplace2021 · 12 citations
  5. 5Default mode network connectivity distinguishes chemotherapy-treated breast cancer survivors from controls2013 · 118 citations