PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 18, 2026Acta Psychologica0 citationsOpen Access

Computational thinking and self-leadership as predictor of innovative work behavior among employees in green product firms : An explanatory sequential mixed method

View Full Paper
BLBin LiSSSaad SaifHWHamid Waqas

Key Points

  • This research investigates how computational thinking and self-leadership impact innovative work behavior in green product firms.
  • Explanatory sequential mixed-method design
  • Data analysis with structural equation modeling in AMOS
  • Qualitative interviews conducted with 18 employees to provide context
  • Computational thinking positively associates with creative self-efficacy (β = 0.62, p < 0.001)
  • Self-leadership positively influences creative self-efficacy (β = 0.56, p < 0.001)
  • Creative self-efficacy significantly mediates the relationship between both computational thinking and self-leadership with innovative work behavior, with indirect effects of β = 0.29 and β = 0.26, respectively.

Abstract

This study employed an explanatory sequential mixed-method design to investigate the factors influencing innovative work behavior in green product firms in Pakistan. Guided by social cognitive theory, data from 278 employees were analyzed using structural equation modeling in AMOS, followed by qualitative interviews to further explain and contextualize the quantitative findings. The findings showed that computational thinking (β = 0.62, p < 0.001) and self‑leadership (β = 0.56, p < 0.001) have a significant positive association with creative self-efficacy. Additionally, creative self-efficacy has a significant direct positive influence on innovative work behavior (β = 0.76, p < 0.001). The mediation analysis confirmed that creative self-efficacy significantly mediated the relationship between computational thinking and innovative work behavior (indirect β = 0.29) and between self‑leadership and innovative work behavior (indirect β = 0.26). Notably, knowledge sharing significantly moderated the relationship between creative self-efficacy and innovative work behavior (β = 0.32, p < 0.001) strengthening the effect of creative self-belief on innovative. Eighteen (n = 18) interviews were conducted to gain insight into how these mechanisms worked. During the thematic analysis, results revealed that knowledge sharing weakens negative effect of hierarchical constraints, enabling employees to act on their creative self-efficacy. Computational thinking is associated with a language of credibility for innovative ideas, while self‑leadership is associated with a necessary internal motivation against bureaucratic fatigue. These findings are relevant for green product firms operating in high power distance, resource-constrained contexts such as Pakistan.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Li et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0aabf55ba8ef6d83b6f99ehttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2026.107030
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Transformational leadership and innovative work behavior: The sequential mediating role of knowledge sharing and creative self-efficacy2025 · 7 citations
  2. 2Knowledge Sharing in Organizations: A Conceptual Framework2003 · 1,602 citations
  3. 3Exploring empowerment cross-cultural differences along the power distance dimension1999 · 201 citations
  4. 4Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies.2003 · 79,915 citations
  5. 5Naturalistic inquiry1985 · 36,026 citations