PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 18, 2026International Journal of Infectious Diseases0 citationsOpen Access

A Multicenter, Open-Label, Randomized, Non-Inferiority Trial of 8 Versus 12 Weeks of Sofosbuvir/Ravidasvir Treatment in Non-Cirrhotic Patients with Chronic Hepatitis C Virus Infection (EASE Trial)

View Full Paper
MHMuhammad Radzi Abu HassanNMNor Asiah MuhamadNMNoor Syahireen Mohammed

Key Points

  • To determine the non-inferiority of an 8-week versus a 12-week regimen of sofosbuvir/ravidasvir in treating chronic hepatitis C virus infection.
  • Multicenter open-label randomized non-inferiority trial conducted in Malaysia.
  • 322 participants aged 18-69 with chronic HCV infection were randomized to receive either 8 or 12 weeks of treatment.
  • Primary endpoint was sustained virologic response at 12 weeks post-treatment (SVR12).
  • 93.4% of the 8-week group achieved SVR12 compared to 93.5% in the 12-week group (p=0.047).
  • Non-inferiority was demonstrated with a 90% confidence interval of -4.94% to 4.85%.
  • Treatment-emergent adverse events were mild and comparable between groups.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether an 8-week regimen of sofosbuvir/ravidasvir is non-inferior to the standard 12-week regimen in non-cirrhotic chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. DESIGN OR METHODS: We conducted a multicenter open-label, randomized, non-inferiority clinical trial across nine hospitals and 17 primary healthcare centers in Malaysia. Adults aged 18-69 years with chronic HCV infection without cirrhosis were randomized (1:1) to receive 8 or 12 weeks of sofosbuvir/ravidasvir. The primary endpoint was sustained virologic response 12 weeks post-treatment (SVR12). The non-inferiority margin was 5%. The primary analysis was performed in the modified intention-to-treat population, excluding participants with missing primary endpoint data. RESULTS: Between March 2021, and March 2023, 322 participants were randomized (161 per arm). Among those with available SVR12 results, 142/152 (93.4%) in the 8-week group and 143/153 (93.5%) in the 12-week group (difference: -0.04%; 90% CI: -4.94%-4.85%; p=0.047), demonstrating non-inferiority. Efficacy was consistent across genotype, baseline viral load, and HIV co-infection subgroups. Treatment-emergent adverse events were comparable and predominantly mild; no treatment-related serious adverse events occurred. CONCLUSION: An 8-week sofosbuvir/ravidasvir regimen achieved SVR12 comparable to 12 weeks in non-cirrhotic adults with chronic HCV infection and was well tolerated. Further pragmatic and cost-effectiveness studies are needed to inform large-scale implementation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04885855 09/05/2021.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Hassan et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0aac6d5ba8ef6d83b6fd8dhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2026.108788
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Hepatitis C Virus Elimination by 2030: Conquering Mount Improbable2020 · 45 citations
  2. 2Urgent action needed to achieve viral hepatitis elimination2024 · 9 citations
  3. 3Barriers to scaling up hepatitis C treatment in Malaysia: a qualitative study with key stakeholders2022 · 10 citations
  4. 4Efficacy of Glecaprevir/Pibrentasvir for 8 or 12 Weeks in Patients With Hepatitis C Virus Genotype 2, 4, 5, or 6 Infection Without Cirrhosis2017 · 232 citations
  5. 5Missing data in randomised controlled trials of rheumatoid arthritis drug therapy are substantial and handled inappropriately2021 · 9 citations