PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 18, 20260 citationsOpen Access

FASE : A Fairness-Aware Spatiotemporal Event Graph Framework for Predictive Policing

View Full Paper
PBPronob Kumar BarmanPBPronoy Kumar BarmanPBPlaban Kumar Barman

Key Points

  • The research aims to address racial disparities in predictive policing by proposing a fairness-aware framework.
  • Developed FASE framework integrating spatiotemporal crime prediction and fairness constraints.
  • Model used 139,982 crime incidents from 2017 to 2019 in Baltimore with a spatiotemporal graph neural network.
  • Patrol allocation formulated as a fairness constrained linear optimization problem with a demographic impact ratio.
  • Model validation loss of 0.4800 and a test loss of 0.4857.
  • Fairness maintained within 0.9928 to 1.0262 across simulation cycles.
  • Detected a persistent gap of approximately 3.5 percentage points in detection rates between minority and non-minority areas.

Abstract

Predictive policing systems that allocate patrol resources based solely on predicted crime risk can unintentionally amplify racial disparities through feedback driven data bias. We present FASE, a Fairness Aware Spatiotemporal Event Graph framework, which integrates spatiotemporal crime prediction with fairness constrained patrol allocation and a closed loop deployment feedback simulator. We model Baltimore as a graph of 25 ZIP Code Tabulation Areas and use 139,982 Part 1 crime incidents from 2017 to 2019 at hourly resolution, producing a sparse feature tensor. The prediction module combines a spatiotemporal graph neural network with a multivariate Hawkes process to capture spatial dependencies and self exciting temporal dynamics. Outputs are modeled using a Zero Inflated Negative Binomial distribution, suitable for overdispersed and zero heavy crime counts. The model achieves a validation loss of 0.4800 and a test loss of 0.4857. Patrol allocation is formulated as a fairness constrained linear optimization problem that maximizes risk weighted coverage while enforcing a Demographic Impact Ratio constraint with deviation bounded by 0.05. Across six simulated deployment cycles, fairness remains within 0.9928 to 1.0262, and coverage ranges from 0.876 to 0.936. However, a persistent detection rate gap of approximately 3.5 percentage points remains between minority and non minority areas. This result shows that allocation level fairness constraints alone do not eliminate feedback induced bias in retraining data, highlighting the need for fairness interventions across the full pipeline.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Barman et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0aaccf5ba8ef6d83b702a8https://doi.org/10.13016/m20x2z-k4wr
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Quantifying fairness in spatial predictive policing2026
  2. 2Algorithmic fairness in predictive policing2024 · 26 citations
  3. 3Unmasking Algorithmic Bias in Predictive Policing: A GAN-Based Simulation Framework with Multi-City Temporal Analysis2026
  4. 4Predictive Policing: A Fairness-aware Approach2024 · 2 citations
  5. 5A Comparative Simulation Study of the Fairness and Accuracy of Predictive Policing Systems in Baltimore City2026