PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 18, 2026BMJ Open0 citationsOpen Access

Do publicly supported generic pharmacies improve financial risk protection? Findings from a nationally representative cross-sectional survey in India

View Full Paper
NPNeha PurohitAGAarti GoyalGJGaurav Jyani

Key Points

  • This study aims to assess the impact of the PMBJP on out-of-pocket expenditure, catastrophic health expenditure, and impoverishment rates due to medicines in India.
  • Cross-sectional observational study conducted across nine states in India in 2022-2023.
  • Data collected from 10,336 patients in outpatient and inpatient departments, as well as private pharmacies and Jan Aushadhi Kendras.
  • Analysis focused on mean out-of-pocket expenditure and incidence of catastrophic health expenditure.
  • Patients using JAKs had a significantly lower mean out-of-pocket expenditure (₹172 OPD, ₹275 IPD) compared to private pharmacy users (₹1085 OPD, ₹3165 IPD).
  • Out-of-pocket expenditure for exclusive JAK users was reduced by 60.6% to 89.3% compared to those using private pharmacies.
  • Private pharmacy users showed a significantly higher likelihood of catastrophic health expenditure.

Abstract

Objectives The Government of India launched the Pradhan Mantri Bhartiya Janaushadhi Pariyojana (PMBJP) to expand access to affordable generics through private retail outlets named as Jan Aushadhi Kendras (JAKs). This study examines the association of PMBJP with out-of-pocket expenditure (OOPE), catastrophic health expenditure (CHE) and impoverishment rate (IR) attributable to medicines. Design A cross-sectional observational study was conducted across nine Indian states in 2022–2023. Setting Outpatient (OPD) and inpatient (IPD) departments of secondary and tertiary government hospitals, private pharmacies and JAKs in 18 districts of India Participants A total of 10 336 patients were recruited from OPD (n=2881) and IPD (n=1009) departments of government hospitals as well as pharmacy settings (n=6446). Data on sociodemographics, disease severity, number of generic prescriptions, source of acquiring medicines and medicine-related OOPE were collected through semistructured interviews and periodic follow-ups. Primary and secondary outcomes Primary outcomes included mean OOPE on medicines, incidence of CHE (≥40% of non-food consumption expenditure on medicines), IR among JAK and non-JAK users were the primary outcomes of the study. Secondary outcomes comprised awareness of JAKs, generic prescribing rates in hospitals and the factors associated with OOPE, CHE and IR. Results Patients procuring medicines exclusively from JAKs reported the lower mean OOPE (OPD: ₹172; IPD: ₹275; pharmacy: ₹307), compared with significantly higher spending at private pharmacies (OPD: ₹1085; IPD: ₹3165; pharmacy: ₹1031). After adjusting for covariates, OOPE among exclusive JAK users was significantly lower relative to private pharmacy users by 60.6%–89.3%. Furthermore, matched analysis confirmed 42% lower expenses, compared with private pharmacies. The likelihood of CHE was also significantly greater among private pharmacy users. However, utilisation of JAKs remained limited, mainly due to low awareness, perceived stock shortages and low rates of generic prescribing. Conclusion PMBJP is associated with significant reduction in OOPE and financial hardship, positioning it as an effective cost-containment intervention within India’s universal health coverage framework. Strengthening supply chains, promoting generic prescribing and integrating JAKs with public facilities would further maximise its impact.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Purohit et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0aace55ba8ef6d83b7048dhttps://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-113839
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper