PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 18, 2026Resources Conservation & Recycling Advances0 citationsOpen Access

Minimising energy in construction: Practitioners’ views on material efficiency – Second Survey

View Full Paper
MLM. LiapopoulouJOJohn Orr

Key Points

  • This research aims to explore engineering practices regarding material efficiency in construction over time.
  • Survey of engineering practices with 106 respondents, mainly from the UK.
  • Longitudinal comparison with previous survey conducted in 2017.
  • Data analyzed using statistical methods like chi-square and regression analysis.
  • Material efficiency identified as a top design priority alongside cost, an increase since 2017.
  • Growing client demand for low-carbon designs noted but overdesign still common due to pre-construction uncertainties.
  • Disconnect exists between engineers' knowledge of loading and serviceability limit states versus code requirements.

Abstract

• A survey of engineering practice with 106 mainly UK-based respondents is presented. • Material efficiency is identified as a key design priority alongside cost. • Overdesign arises to accommodate pre-construction changes in loads or geometry. • Changes between 2017–2022 show increased emphasis on material efficiency. • Research questions are proposed to guide embodied energy and carbon reduction. This paper presents a survey of engineering practice and culture in structural design relating to material efficiency. The survey included 44 questions and received 106 responses, predominantly from practicing structural engineers in the UK. It builds upon a previous survey from 2017 with the same set of questions, allowing a longitudinal study of changes over time. The results were analysed using statistical methods, including chi-square tests, Mann-Whitney U tests, two-sample t-tests of independence, regression analysis, and analysis of covariance. The findings showed that material efficiency ranks at the top of design priorities, alongside cost, a notable shift since the 2017 survey. There is also growing, though not yet universal, client demand for low-carbon designs. Despite these advances, overdesign remains prevalent, primarily due to the need to accommodate potential changes in span, loading, or layout prior to construction. The survey also revealed a disconnect between engineers’ understanding of vertical floor loading and serviceability limit states and current code requirements. The results are complemented by research questions that emerged during the study, which require further input from the research community.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Liapopoulou et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0aad145ba8ef6d83b708d4https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcradv.2026.200347
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper