PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 18, 20260 citationsOpen Access

The Effectiveness of Audio-Lingual Drills in Improving Uzbek Efl Learners' Pronunciation of Problematic English Sounds

View Full Paper
MHMukambarbonu Odiljon qizi Hamidova

Key Points

  • This research aims to determine if audio-lingual drills enhance pronunciation of English sounds among Uzbek EFL learners.
  • Two classroom cycles over 4 weeks with 26 learners (A2–B1)
  • Daily minimal-pair and pattern drills in communicative dialogues
  • Pre/post measures included reading tasks, picture-prompt dialogues, and a teacher rubric for intelligibility.
  • Median gains in segmental accuracy: /θ/ from 42%→73%; /w–v/ from 61%→86%
  • Improved cluster realization from 38%→67% and target-like stress placement from 49%→72%
  • Students reported increased confidence and transfer of skills to role-playing activities.

Abstract

This exploratory action research investigates whether integrating focused audio-lingual drills into regular lessons improves Uzbek learners’ production of problematic English sounds (/θ, ð/, /w–v/, tense–lax vowels /iː–ɪ/, final consonant clusters) and primary word stress. Over two classroom cycles (4 weeks, N=26, A2–B1), learners completed daily minimal-pair and pattern drills embedded in short communicative dialogues. Pre/post measures included a controlled word-and-sentence reading task, a brief picture-prompt dialogue, and a teacher rubric for intelligibility. Results showed medium-to-large gains in segmental accuracy (e.g., /θ/ from 42%→73%; /w–v/ from 61%→86%), improved cluster realization (from 38%→67%), and more target-like stress placement (from 49%→72%). Students reported higher confidence and noticed transfer from drills to role-plays. The study aligns with regional findings on Uzbek pronunciation challenges and points to a practical hybrid: short, intensive audio-lingual drills immediately “recycled” in communicative tasks. Implications include targeting L1-Uzbek interference, dialectal influence, and explicit prosody work.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Mukambarbonu Odiljon qizi Hamidova (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0aad145ba8ef6d83b7097ehttps://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20228452
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1ENHANCING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF TEACHING UZBEK PHONETICS THROUGH DIFFERENTIATED INSTRUCTION IN COGNATE-LANGUAGE CLASSROOMS2026
  2. 2GENERAL PHONETIC CHARACTERISTICS OF THE UZBEK LANGUAGE IN RELATION TO STRESS PATTERNS2026
  3. 3PHONETIC, PHONOLOGICAL, AND MORPHOLOGICAL CHALLENGES OF INTERMEDIATE ESL LEARNERS: A CLASSROOM-BASED ANALYSIS2026
  4. 4Effects of Experience and Foreign-Accented Input on L1 Ecuadorian Spanish Speakers’ Production of English Vowels2026
  5. 5Staged Implementation Of Phonetic Exercises In Primary EFL Classrooms2025