PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 18, 2026Health Expectations0 citationsOpen Access

Constructs, Predictive Factors and Measures: Insights From the Mental Health in the Moment (MHIM) Co‐Production Panel

View Full Paper
LPLuke PowerDHDejla HoxhaLCLorna Caddick

Key Points

  • This paper aims to provide guidance on co-production methods for adolescent mental health research, focusing on relevant constructs and measures.
  • Members (n=18) engaged in online focus group sessions to rank constructs and measures related to mental health.
  • Participants discussed and ranked mental health constructs, predictive factors, and measures from most to least relevant.
  • A semantic thematic analysis was conducted on the session materials, with findings verified by MHIM-YPAG members.
  • Participants highlighted both positive and negative mental health constructs as essential.
  • Key predictive factors identified include social media, academic stress, and relationships.
  • Considerations on language use and response scale length were deemed important for measure appropriateness.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Introduction There is growing recognition of the methodological benefits of co‐producing adolescent mental health research. Co‐production supports the development of study methodologies that are more relevant and appropriate for the examination of adolescents' mental health. Within this article, insights from the Mental Health in the Moment Young Person Advisory Group (MHIM‐YPAG) are presented in relation to which mental health constructs, predictive factors and measures were endorsed by young people for inclusion in a mental health study. The aim of this paper is to provide guidance to researchers, highlight the benefits of co‐production and provide a template for co‐production in mental health study measures. Methods Members ( n = 18) took part in online ‘focus group style’ sessions covering constructs, predictive factors and measures related to adolescent mental health. They were asked to discuss and then individually rank a set of constructs, predictive factors and measures from most to least relevant. Following this, a semantic thematic analysis of session materials was performed by researchers and findings were verified by MHIM‐YPAG members. Results Members emphasised the importance of general and specific constructs that reflected both positive and negative traits. In addition, they emphasised the importance of examining suicidality/suicide‐ideation. Social media, academic stress and relationships were the most relevant predictive factors for this group. Language use and response scale length were important when deciding measures appropriateness. Conclusion This paper highlights the importance of involving young people as co‐producers within adolescent mental health research. Benefits include improving the appropriateness and relevance of the study design. Insights may act as a guide for researchers involved in adolescent mental health research. Patient and Public Contribution The ‘MHIM‐YPAG’ was established to enable the involvement of young people to co‐produce the MHIM project. Thus, this paper details the insights made by the MHIM‐YPAG regarding the inclusion of specific mental health constructs, predictive factors and measures. As detailed in the MHIM‐YPAG protocol paper, young people will be involved through the 5‐year project in a co‐production capacity.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Power et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0aad2a5ba8ef6d83b70a4dhttps://doi.org/10.1111/hex.70686
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper