The iDSCA system noninvasively detected an average relative blood flow index change of -23.38% in humans, consistent with Transcranial Doppler measurements (-20.43%).
Does the iDSCA system accurately detect changes in common carotid artery blood flow compared to standard Doppler ultrasound?
The novel iDSCA system can noninvasively and sensitively capture hemodynamic changes caused by common carotid artery stenosis, showing strong correlation with established Doppler ultrasound techniques.
Absolute Event Rate: -23.38% vs -20.43%
ABSTRACT This study applied the Interferometric Diffusion Speckle Contrast Analysis (iDSCA) system developed by our research group to detect changes in common carotid artery blood flow. Through animal experiments combining color Doppler ultrasound and human in vivo experiments integrating Transcranial Doppler, the iDSCA system was validated as a technical modality for early warning of ischemic stroke. The experimental results show that in animal experiments, the average relative blood flow index change rate detected by iDSCA after stenosis is −56.66%, which is consistent with the detection result of color Doppler ultrasound (−63.17%). In human in vivo experiments, the average rBFI (%) detected by iDSCA was −23.38%, consistent with the average rate of change in blood flow velocity (rMV(%) = −20.43%) measured by TCD. The iDSCA system has demonstrated significant correlation in both animal and in vivo experiments, confirming its ability to noninvasively and sensitively capture hemodynamic changes caused by CCA stenosis.
Han et al. (Fri,) conducted a other in Ischemic stroke. Interferometric Diffusion Speckle Contrast Analysis (iDSCA) vs. Transcranial Doppler (TCD) was evaluated on Average relative blood flow index change rate in human in vivo experiments. The iDSCA system noninvasively detected an average relative blood flow index change of -23.38% in humans, consistent with Transcranial Doppler measurements (-20.43%).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: