PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
July 1, 2010Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine1,057 citations

American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists Guideline Recommendations for Immunohistochemical Testing of Estrogen and Progesterone Receptors in Breast Cancer (Unabridged Version)

View Full Paper
MHM. Elizabeth H. HammondDHDaniel F. HayesMDMitch Dowsett

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Abstract Purpose. —To develop a guideline to improve the accuracy of immunohistochemical (IHC) estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PgR) testing in breast cancer and the utility of these receptors as predictive markers. Methods. —The American Society of Clinical Oncology and the College of American Pathologists convened an international Expert Panel that conducted a systematic review and evaluation of the literature in partnership with Cancer Care Ontario and developed recommendations for optimal IHC ER/PgR testing performance. Results. —Up to 20% of current IHC determinations of ER and PgR testing worldwide may be inaccurate (false negative or false positive). Most of the issues with testing have occurred because of variation in pre-analytic variables, thresholds for positivity, and interpretation criteria. Recommendations. —The Panel recommends that ER and PgR status be determined on all invasive breast cancers and breast cancer recurrences. A testing algorithm that relies on accurate, reproducible assay performance is proposed. Elements to reliably reduce assay variation are specified. It is recommended that ER and PgR assays be considered positive if there are at least 1% positive tumor nuclei in the sample on testing in the presence of expected reactivity of internal (normal epithelial elements) and external controls. The absence of benefit from endocrine therapy for women with ER-negative invasive breast cancers has been confirmed in large overviews of randomized clinical trials.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Hammond et al. (2010) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0cd4b4a4d785ea81626254https://doi.org/10.5858/134.7.e48
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Expanding Priorities — Confronting Chronic Disease in Countries with Low Income2007 · 195 citations
  2. 2Precision in Estrogen and Progesterone Receptor Assays. Results of the First CAP Pilot Survey1983 · 4 citations
  3. 3Influence of Fixation, Antibody Clones, and Signal Amplification on Steroid Receptor Analysis1998 · 65 citations
  4. 4Influence of Synthetic Oestrogens on Advanced Malignant Disease1944 · 301 citations
  5. 5Use of a monoclonal anti-estrogen receptor antibody in the immunohistochemical evaluation of human tumors.1986 · 425 citations