PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 20, 2026World Development0 citationsOpen Access

The environmental smile curve: input-output evidence on the pollution haven hypothesis

View Full Paper
GDGiovanni DosiFRFederico RiccioMVMaria Enrica Virgillito

Key Points

  • This research investigates how Global Value Chains (GVCs) create economic and environmental disparities among nations.
  • Analyzed OECD ICIO and CO2 emission data to evaluate emission distribution across GVC stages.
  • Examined the relationship between value capture and environmental impacts in different global production segments.
  • Identified that CO2 emissions are more prevalent in midstream stages, predominantly in developing economies.
  • Found that deeper GVC integration exacerbates environmental and economic inequalities for the Global South.

Abstract

• CO 2 emissions are unevenly distributed across GVC stages: developing economies cluster in emission-intensive midstream, advanced in cleaner upstream/downstream. • Reliance on foreign intermediates further amplifies environmental inequality along GVCs. • These asymmetries have intensified over the past 25 years together with the rise of GVCs. • The distribution of emissions mirrors the distribution of value capture, suggesting that unequal exchange is structurally embedded in the organization of GVCs. • For developing economies, GVC integration may entail a double asymmetry: weaker value capture and heavier pollution burdens. This paper examines how the fragmentation of production across Global Value Chains (GVCs) generates both economic and environmental inequalities. Integrating OECD ICIO and CO 2 emission data, our analysis reveals an environmental smile curve , where environmental and economic downgrading co-occur in middle segments of GVCs, reinforcing global inequalities. These disparities intensify with deeper GVC penetration, challenging the decoupling narrative of green growth. By integrating labour and emission data, we provide novel evidence of how GVCs structurally embed asymmetric power relations between production segments, generating unequal ecological and economic burdens across the globe. While the Global North has strategically benefited from GVCs, the Global South has experienced the heightening of its peripheral and subordinated position.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Dosi et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0d4f19f03e14405aa9a490https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2026.107411
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1The governance of global value chains2005 · 6,871 citations
  2. 2Smile-and-go. Regional performance through global value chains in Europe2024 · 33 citations
  3. 3Capitalism’s systemic barriers to environmental upgrading in global value chains2026 · 7 citations
  4. 4Rethinking the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis across 214 countries: the impacts of 12 economic, institutional, technological, resource, and social factors2024 · 95 citations
  5. 5Kyoto and Carbon Leakage: An Empirical Analysis of the Carbon Content of Bilateral Trade2014 · 379 citations