Abstract Rationale Repeated high resolution computed tomography (HRCT) is the monitoring anchor in fibrotic ILD but imposes radiation, cost, and access burdens. We asked whether validated non-ionizing signals—lung ultrasound (LUS) B-lines/pleural changes, digitally detected “Velcro” crackles, and forced vital capacity (FVC) trajectories—support a pragmatic algorithm to reduce discretionary HRCT without sacrificing safety. Prior studies report strong LUS-HRCT concordance and high diagnostic accuracy of digital crackle detection; FVC decline remains a robust progression marker. Methods We registered a protocol and conducted a PRISMA-conform systematic review (MEDLINE/Embase/Cochrane/CINAHL, inception-September 2025). Inclusion: adults with ILD or CTD-ILD; index tests LUS and/or digital auscultation and/or longitudinal FVC; reference HRCT or adjudicated progression. Outcomes: diagnostic accuracy, agreement, and longitudinal associations. Two reviewers screened/extracted; risk of bias (QUADAS-2/QUIPS). Using prespecified accuracy thresholds from individual studies, we synthesized an evidence-derived “CT-Minimal” clinic algorithm and performed a rule-in/rule-out decision analysis anchored to reported cut-points (no new patient recruitment). Results Twenty-three studies met criteria. Key reproducible anchors were: (1) LUS B-lines ≥10 identified significant ILD versus HRCT with sensitivity 96.3% and specificity 92.3% in systemic sclerosis (Warrick≥7), with strong LUS-HRCT correlation (ρ≈0.82-0.96). Examination time ≈9 minutes. (2) Digital auscultation (VECTOR) detected CTD-ILD with accuracy 82.6% (sensitivity 88.1%, specificity 78.6%) against HRCT. (3) Physician agreement for digitally recorded crackles in fibrotic ILD was moderate-to-good (κ 0.57 overall; intra-rater up to 0.87), supporting longitudinal use. (4) FVC decline is firmly linked to progression/mortality; contemporary cohorts and registries validate FVC change as the principal clinical end point. New contribution: We operationalized a CT-Minimal algorithm: defer HRCT when all are true—LUS 10 B-lines without pleural irregularity; negative digital crackle screen; no absolute FVC decline ≥5% over 6-12 months—while obtaining HRCT when any criterion is positive. Mapping these thresholds onto the accuracy estimates above indicates high rule-out safety for significant ILD and provides a structured pathway to reserve HRCT for progression signals. Conclusion High-quality studies show that LUS, digital auscultation, and FVC trajectories carry actionable signals in fibrotic ILD. An evidence-derived algorithm can rationalize HRCT use and is ready for prospective validation as a clinic workflow to cut radiation exposure while maintaining vigilance for progression. This abstract is funded by: none
Basta et al. (2026) studied this question.