PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 20, 2026European Journal of Endocrinology0 citationsOpen Access

Navepegritide Combined with Lonapegsomatropin for the Treatment of Children with Achondroplasia: 52-Week Results from the Phase 2 COACH Trial

View Full Paper
CMCiara McDonnellMIMelita IrvingLNLine Aagaard Nolting

Key Points

  • The research aims to evaluate the effectiveness of combining navepegritide and lonapegsomatropin in enhancing growth in children with achondroplasia.
  • In the phase 2 COACH trial, children aged 2 to 11 received weekly doses of navepegritide and lonapegsomatropin.
  • The primary efficacy measure was the annualized growth velocity (AGV) at Week 52 compared to monotherapy AGV from the ApproaCH trial (NCT05598320).
  • Treatment-naive children showed an AGV of 8.69 cm/year with combination therapy, significantly higher than the 5.95 cm/year AGV with navepegritide monotherapy (p<0.0001).
  • An increase of 3.89 cm/year from baseline was observed in treatment-naive children (p=0.0015).
  • Navepegritide-experienced children exhibited an AGV of 8.42 cm/year, with a notable increase of 3.28 cm/year from their previous treatment baseline (p<0.0001).

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Navepegritide, a prodrug of C-type natriuretic peptide, has demonstrated improved growth and additional benefits, including lower limb alignment, in children with achondroplasia. The well-described mechanism-of-action of navepegritide in the growth plate is hypothesized to enhance its receptivity to lonapegsomatropin, a prodrug of somatropin, to provide benefits beyond those seen with monotherapies in achondroplasia. METHODS: In the proof-of-concept phase 2 COACH trial, children with achondroplasia aged 2 to 11 received weekly navepegritide and lonapegsomatropin. The primary efficacy endpoint was annualized growth velocity (AGV) at Week 52 versus AGV with navepegritide monotherapy in the ApproaCH trial (NCT05598320). RESULTS: Twenty-one children were enrolled: 12 received no prior growth-promoting treatment (treatment-naive, TN) and 9 had been receiving navepegritide monotherapy for >1 year (navepegritide-experienced, NE). At Week 52, TN children receiving navepegritide and lonapegsomatropin had a least squares mean AGV of 8.69 cm/year versus 5.95 cm/year for matched children who received navepegritide monotherapy, a difference of 2.74 cm/year (p<0.0001). Observed mean AGV for TN children was 8.80 cm/year, a +3.89 cm/year increase from baseline (p=0.0015). NE children had an observed mean AGV of 8.42 cm/year, a +3.28 cm/year increase from navepegritide-treated baseline (p<0.0001). An improvement in body proportionality was observed and arm span increased substantially (+9.4 cm in TN and +7.9 cm in NE children), in line with gains in height. Treatments were well-tolerated with generally mild adverse events and no treatment discontinuations. CONCLUSION: In this prospective trial, the robust growth and anthropometric results suggest that by continuously relieving the pre-hypertrophic block in achondroplasia, navepegritide may make the growth plate more responsive to the strong complementary effect of lonapegsomatropin.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

McDonnell et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0d4f34f03e14405aa9a768https://doi.org/10.1093/ejendo/lvag082
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper