Abstract Rationale The pathophysiology and clinical impact of liver injury in pulmonary hypertension (PH) is poorly understood. Liver injury in PH is often attributed to hepatic congestion, but some studies have failed to find strong associations with hemodynamics, suggesting alternative mechanisms. We sought to define the prevalence of liver injury and patterns of liver injury across the spectrum of PH and to determine whether patterns of liver injury were associated with clinical characteristics, hemodynamics and outcomes. Methods We performed an analysis of the PVDOMICS study, a multicenter, prospective, longitudinal cohort study that enrolled incident and prevalent patients with PH and disease comparators. The prevalence of liver injury, defined as aspartate or alanine aminotransferase (AST or ALT) or total bilirubin above the upper limit of normal, and different patterns of liver injury hepatocellular (elevated AST or ALT with normal bilirubin), cholestatic (elevated bilirubin) and no liver injury was defined among participants with known or suspected PH. Associations between patterns of liver injury with demographics, hemodynamics, right ventricular function, exercise capacity and quality of life (QoL) were assessed. We used Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for age and sex to assess the association of liver injury patterns with transplant-free survival. Results Liver injury was present in 27.8% (288/1036) of participants (19.0% cholestatic and 8.8% hepatocellular). Patients with liver injury were less likely to be female and have prevalent disease with differences in PH classification (Table 1). Patients with hepatocellular liver injury had a higher body mass index. A cholestatic liver injury pattern was most consistently associated with worse functional class, biventricular filling pressures, pulmonary vascular resistance, right ventricular function, natriuretic peptide elevation, exercise capacity, and REVEAL risk scores. Total bilirubin levels and right atrial pressure as a marker of systemic congestion were weakly correlated (r2=0.02, p 0.0001). Compared to no liver injury, cholestatic liver injury was associated with an increased risk of death in age and sex adjusted models (HR 1.6, 95% CI 1.3-2.1, p 0.001) but hepatocellular liver injury was not (p 0.05). Conclusions Liver injury is common among patients with known or suspected PH. In contrast to a hepatocellular injury pattern, a cholestatic liver injury pattern was most consistently associated with worse hemodynamics, exercise capacity, QoL and survival. However, the weak relationship between right atrial pressure and bilirubin suggests that systemic congestion alone is unlikely to completely explain cholestatic liver injury. Further study is needed to uncouple the pathophysiological basis of cholestasis in PH. This abstract is funded by: NHLBI
Dubrock et al. (2026) studied this question.