PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 20, 2026American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine0 citations

A67-03 Temporal Trends in Utilization of Pulmonary Embolism Response Teams and Interventional Therapies

View Full Paper
JDJ DeberryFSF A ShahFTF Thoma

Key Result

PERT consultation for acute PE increased from 38% in 2015 to 55% in 2024 (p=0.05), with mechanical thrombectomy use rising from 0% to 19% and catheter-directed thrombolysis falling from 26% to 1%.

Key Points

  • This study aims to analyze trends in the utilization of Pulmonary Embolism Response Teams (PERT) and interventional therapies over time in patients with acute pulmonary embolism.
  • Retrospective analysis of 3,531 patients with acute PE referred to a hospital PERT from 2015 to 2024.
  • Assessment of demographics, lab results, cardiac biomarkers, imaging, and clinical outcomes from electronic medical records.
  • Nonparametric testing to evaluate trends in PERT consultations and advanced intervention utilizations.
  • The proportion of PEs consulted for PERT increased from 38% in 2015 to 55% in 2024 (p=0.05).
  • Catheter directed thrombolysis (CDL) decreased from 26% in 2015-2016 to 1% in 2024 (p=0.006).
  • Mechanical thrombectomy (MT) increased from 0% in 2015 to 19% in 2024 (p=0.006).

Study Design

Type

Observational (n=3,531)

Multicenter

Yes

Structured PICO

P
Population
3,531 unique cases of acute pulmonary embolism (PE) referred to the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center PERT from 2015-2024
I
Intervention
Pulmonary Embolism Response Teams (PERT) and advanced interventional therapies (catheter directed thrombolysis, mechanical thrombectomy, surgical embolectomy, systemic thrombolysis)
O
Outcome
Temporal trends in the proportion of all PE cases for which PERT was consulted, and the proportion of PEs deemed intermediate risk, high risk, or with clot-in-transit for which advanced interventions were utilized

Over a 9-year period, PERT utilization for acute PE increased significantly, accompanied by a shift in advanced therapies from catheter-directed thrombolysis to mechanical thrombectomy.

Main Result

Absolute Event Rate: 55% vs 38%

p-value: p=0.05

Abstract

Abstract Rationale Pulmonary Embolism Response Teams (PERTs) are multidisciplinary teams to improve the rapid assessment, risk stratification and standardization of pulmonary embolus (PE) management, including guiding the utilization of advanced interventional therapies, surgical thrombectomy, and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). We performed this study to understand temporal trends in PERT utilization and evolving interventional practices over time. Methods We performed a retrospective analysis of patients with acute PE referred to the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center PERT from 2015-2024. Demographics, laboratory, cardiac biomarkers, imaging, and clinical outcomes data were abstracted from the electronic medical record. Risk stratification of acute PE was performed using the 2019 European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines. We used nonparametric testing to analyze temporal trends in (1) the proportion of all PE cases for which PERT was consulted, and (2) the proportion of PEs deemed intermediate risk, high risk, or with clot-in-transit for which advanced interventions were utilized. Advanced interventions included catheter directed thrombolysis (CDL), mechanical thrombectomy (MT), surgical embolectomy (SE), and systemic thrombolysis (ST). Results 3,531 unique cases of acute PE were included (58.6% low risk, 33.1% intermediate risk, 6.9% high risk, and 1.5% clot in transit). PE severity did not change over time. The proportion of PEs for which PERT was consulted over time increased from 38% in 2015 to 55% in 2024, (p = 0.05). CDL utilization peaked in 2015 and 2016 (26% and 26% of intermediate or high risk PEs) and decreased over time to 1% in 2024 (p = 0.006). MT increased from 0% in 2015 to 19% in 2024 (p = 0.006). SE and ST did not have a statistically significant change over time. Conclusions In a single hospital system multi-site registry of patients with acute PE, PERT utilization increased over time, while the overall severity of PE did not differ. The rise in PERT usage implies growing recognition of such multidisciplinary teams as an effective strategy for acute PE management. Further studies in this cohort will investigate reasons for the shift from catheter-directed thrombolysis and other advanced therapies to suction thrombectomy, and subsequent impact on clinical outcomes. This abstract is funded by: None

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Deberry et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Acute pulmonary embolism (n=3,531). Pulmonary Embolism Response Team (PERT) consultation and advanced interventions vs. Temporal trends (2015 vs 2024) was evaluated on Proportion of all PE cases for which PERT was consulted (p=0.05). PERT consultation for acute PE increased from 38% in 2015 to 55% in 2024 (p=0.05), with mechanical thrombectomy use rising from 0% to 19% and catheter-directed thrombolysis falling from 26% to 1%.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0d4f7bf03e14405aa9ad24https://doi.org/10.1093/ajrccm/aamag162.5598
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Trends in catheter-directed therapy and in-hospital outcomes among patients with acute pulmonary embolism: insights from a multicentre national quality assurance database registry2025 · 4 citations
  2. 2A28-14 Multidisciplinary Pulmonary Embolism Response Teams Reduce Mortality in Intermediate- And High-Risk Pulmonary Embolism: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis2026
  3. 3Trends in Catheter-Directed Therapy and In-Hospital Outcomes Among Patients with Acute Pulmonary Embolism: Insights from a Multicenter National Quality Assurance Database Registry2025
  4. 4The role of the PERT in the management and therapeutic decision-making in pulmonary embolism2022 · 12 citations
  5. 5A multidisciplinary pulmonary embolism response team (PERT)—experience from a national multicenter consortium2019 · 85 citations