PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 20, 2026American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine0 citations

D105-14 Improving Nontuberculous Mycobacteria Screening in Pediatric Cystic Fibrosis Patients Through a Quality Improvement Initiative

View Full Paper
MRM RehmanWSW S StoudemireSRS Ratner

Key Points

  • The aim is to enhance screening rates for nontuberculous mycobacteria in pediatric patients with cystic fibrosis to 90%.
  • Initiated a quality improvement project with multidisciplinary teams to identify barriers to screening.
  • Developed a standardized process for screening using CF guidelines and enhanced questionnaires.
  • Monitored screening trends through run charts and utilized Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles for continuous evaluation.
  • Weekly form completion averaged 73% between March 2025 and October 2025.
  • 95% of eligible patients were successfully screened for NTM.
  • Among screened patients, 18% had never been screened before, and 29% reported intermittent sputum production.

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Nontuberculous Mycobacteria (NTM) are ubiquitous organisms capable of causing severe lung damage in pediatric patients with Cystic Fibrosis (CF) (1,2). The CF Foundation recommends annual screening for NTM for patients who spontaneously expectorate. Acceptable specimens for screening include sputum, induced sputum, bronchoalveolar lavage, or bronchial washing (3). Baseline national screening rates for pediatric CF programs were less than 60%, and our CF center has been either at or below that level for several years. To address this gap, our CF team initiated a Quality Improvement (QI) project aimed at increasing screening rates to 90% by December 2025. Methods A multidisciplinary team was formed to identify barriers to NTM screening and to test interventions for improving screening rates, refining them using Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles. Before project implementation, the center lacked a standardized process for identifying and screening patients at risk for NTM infection. Utilization of the existing clinic questionnaire was inconsistent, and standing culture orders placed up to a year in advance often resulted in specimen mislabeling. A standardized process for NTM screening was developed using CF guidelines (3). The existing questionnaire incorporated two additional questions: one to assess whether the patient could produce sputum during the current visit, and another to determine if the patient had produced sputum within the previous month. No baseline data existed regarding patients’ ability to produce sputum. Based on questionnaire responses, nurses placed orders for the appropriate specimen—either sputum or an oropharyngeal swab—avoiding standing orders. Patients who had not been screened in the prior year were identified through weekly screening reports for patients scheduled to be seen the following week and shared with the CF QI team. Trends in screening were monitored using run charts, allowing continuous evaluation of process improvements. The number of completed forms served as a process measure to assess adherence. Results Between March 2025 and October 2025, weekly form completion averaged 73%. Analysis of questionnaire responses revealed that 12% of our patients could produce sputum. Overall, 95% of eligible patients were successfully screened. Among screened patients, 18% had never undergone screening before, 20% had not been screened in over one year, and 29% reported intermittent sputum production at home. Conclusion This QI project demonstrates that systematic, high-quality methods can significantly enhance NTM screening in pediatric CF patients. Standardized workflows, targeted questionnaires, process monitoring, and using PDSA cycles contributed to increased screening and improved identification of patients requiring NTM testing. This abstract is funded by: None

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Rehman et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0d4f92f03e14405aa9add1https://doi.org/10.1093/ajrccm/aamag162.2197
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper