PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 20, 2026American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine0 citations

C105-08 Respiratory Viral Sepsis as a Major and Persistent Cause of Hospitalization and Death in a Multi-Hospital Cohort, 2016-2024

View Full Paper
CSC N ShappellMKM KlompasCMC McKenna

Key Points

  • To evaluate the burden and outcomes of respiratory viral sepsis among hospitalized adults across multiple hospitals from 2016 to 2024.
  • Retrospective analysis of electronic health record data from 9 hospitals in New England
  • Defined community-onset respiratory viral infections using positive PCR tests within ±48 hours of admission
  • Analyzed incidence and mortality of community-onset respiratory viral sepsis compared to presumed bacterial sepsis.
  • Among 1,550,694 encounters, 11,567 individuals (25.2%) had community-onset respiratory viral sepsis.
  • Composite mortality rates were 20.4% for presumed bacterial sepsis, compared to 18.5% for RV sepsis, indicating comparable risks.
  • Non-SARS-CoV-2 viral sepsis accounted for significant mortality rates, particularly from influenza and respiratory adenovirus.

Abstract

Abstract Rationale SARS-CoV-2 was a major cause of sepsis during the COVID-19 pandemic, but the burden and outcomes of sepsis from other respiratory viruses and during non-pandemic periods have not been well described. Methods We retrospectively analyzed electronic health record data from all adults admitted to 9 hospitals in New England, 2016-2024. Community-onset (CO) respiratory viral (RV) infections were defined as a positive RV PCR within ±48 hours of hospital arrival. RV sepsis was defined as RV infection with hypoxia (SpO294% or supplemental oxygen), plus 1 acute organ dysfunction within one day of positive viral test. We calculated overall and annual hospital incidence, in-hospital death or discharge to hospice rates (composite mortality outcome), and proportion of overall sepsis cases accounted for by 1) CO RV sepsis and 2) CO presumed-bacterial sepsis (defined using updated CDC Adult Sepsis Event criteria, excluding patients also meeting CO-RV sepsis criteria). Results Among 1,550,694 encounters from 746,752 individuals, 86,578 (5.6%) had CO presumed bacterial sepsis and 45,927 (3.0%) had CO-RV infections, of whom 11,567 (25.2%) had CO-RV sepsis. One-third of CO-RV sepsis cases (n = 3,985, 34.5%) were due to non-SARS-CoV-2 viruses, most commonly influenza A and B (n = 1,932, 16.7%), rhinovirus (n = 738, 6.4%) and RSV (n = 726, 6.3%). The composite mortality rate was 6.9% for CO-RV infections, 18.5% for RV sepsis, and 20.4% for CO presumed bacterial sepsis. While SARS-CoV-2-associated sepsis had the highest mortality (20.9%), non-SARS-CoV-2 viral sepsis also carried substantial risk, with mortality rates ranging from 11.9% for influenza to 21.1% for respiratory adenovirus (13.8% overall). CO-RV sepsis incidence and proportion of overall sepsis cases peaked in 2020 (17.8% of all sepsis cases) and 2022 (20.3% of sepsis cases) but remained above pre-pandemic levels through 2024 (13.8% of sepsis cases, compared to 1.8-5.3% from 2016-2019). Non-SARS-CoV-2 CO-RV sepsis counts have increased since 2021 and now account for as many sepsis cases as SARS-CoV-2 (Figure, panel A). Composite mortality for RV sepsis peaked in 2020 (25.4%) and 2021 (22.2%) then stabilized between 14.7-16.8% in 2022-2024 (Figure, panels B-D). Conclusions Respiratory viruses are a major and persistent cause of sepsis in hospitalized patients, with mortality rates comparable to presumed bacterial sepsis. Although SARS-CoV-2 drove an initial surge in RV sepsis during the COVID-19 pandemic, non-SARS-CoV-2 viruses account for a substantial and increasing portion of sepsis cases, likely reflecting increased testing and recognition of RV infections and underscoring the need for continued RV sepsis testing, surveillance, and prevention beyond COVID-19. This abstract is funded by: AHRQ

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Shappell et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0d5025f03e14405aa9bbc9https://doi.org/10.1093/ajrccm/aamag162.6257
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper