PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 20, 2026Journal of Agribusiness in Developing and Emerging Economies0 citations

Long-run dynamics of minimum support price transmission to farm harvest prices in India: evidence using cointegration and VECM approach

View Full Paper
PSPurushottam SharmaDMDinesh Chand MeenaNJNeha Joshi

Key Points

  • The aim is to investigate how minimum support price affects farm harvest prices over the long term and how quickly farm prices adjust to changes in MSP.
  • Analyzed data from 1980-81 to 2022-23 using Johansen cointegration technique.
  • Applied vector error correction model (VECM) to understand long-term adjustments.
  • Used VAR model for short-term analysis when no cointegration was found.
  • Identified a significant long-run equilibrium relationship between MSP and FHP for most crops.
  • From 1980 to 2000, FHP often exceeded MSP, benefiting farmers from market conditions.
  • Post-2000, FHP frequently fell below MSP, indicating MSP's diminishing role as a price floor.

Abstract

Purpose The paper aims to generate evidence on the influence of minimum support price (MSP) on farm harvest prices (FHP) in the long-run and the speed of adjustment of farm gate prices to the changes in MSP. Design/methodology/approach This study examined the long-run equilibrium relationship between MSP and FHP using data from 1980-81 to 2022-23. Johansen cointegration technique and vector error correction model (VECM) for cointegrated variables were estimated to capture both the short-term dynamics and long-term adjustment process. Whereas, if no cointegration was found, a standard VAR model was used to analyze the short-term interactions between MSP and FHP. Findings The results reveal a significant long-run equilibrium relationship between MSP and FHP for most crops with varying levels of price responsiveness and adjustment patterns. From 1980 to 2000, FHP often exceeded MSP, reflecting robust market conditions where farmers benefited from market forces without relying heavily on MSP. Post-2000, FHP often fell below MSP for almost all selected crops, indicating the increasing failure of MSP to act as a reliable price floor. Research limitations/implications Variations in procurement of crop output at MSP across states may lead to differences in farmers’ price realization, which has not been fully explored. Originality/value These findings highlight the need for policy reforms to strengthen MSP implementation and expand its coverage via tailored decentralization of procurement. The insights provided are crucial for designing an inclusive and responsive crop price policy that fulfills its intended role in India’s agricultural economy.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Sharma et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0d5025f03e14405aa9bcf6https://doi.org/10.1108/jadee-02-2025-0077
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Domestic and international impacts of rice export restrictions: The recent case of indian non-basmati rice2024 · 18 citations
  2. 2The role of farm subsidies in changing India’s water footprint2024 · 19 citations
  3. 3Multiple Structural Breaks in Vector Error Correction Models2025 · 1 citations
  4. 4The effects of NCPB marketing policies on maize market prices in Kenya2008 · 88 citations
  5. 5Agricultural Price Policy, Output, and Farm Profitability—Examining Linkages during Post-Reform Period in India2013 · 27 citations