PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 20, 2026Journal of Orthopedics Traumatology and Rehabilitation0 citationsOpen Access

Beyond Radiographic Evaluation: Does Gait Asymmetry Persist Despite Optimal Alignment Following Total Hip Arthroplasty

View Full Paper
MAMohammad AkramVKVineet KumarPKPrabhat Kumar

Key Points

  • To examine the connection between radiological alignment and gait symmetry following unilateral total hip arthroplasty.
  • Analyzed 45 patients post-unilateral uncemented total hip arthroplasty with 1-year follow-up.
  • Assessed Harris hip score, WOMAC scores, and radiological measures including femoral offset and neck-shaft angle.
  • Conducted gait analysis using 3D motion capture to evaluate different stride and step metrics across limbs.
  • Radiological alignment metrics were satisfactory with mean values for femoral offset at 32.93 ± 4.30 mm and neck-shaft angle at 130.64° ± 4.60°.
  • Stride time was significantly longer in the operated limb (1.20 ± 0.02 s) compared to non-operated (1.18 ± 0.00 s) and normal limbs (1.10 ± 0.00 s, P < 0.0001).
  • Step width was greater bilaterally (0.14 ± 0.01 m) compared to normal (0.08 ± 0.01 m, P < 0.0001).

Abstract

Abstract Background: Total hip replacement (THR) is typically evaluated using radiographic outcomes and clinical scores. However, restoration of anatomical alignment may not reflect true functional recovery. Objective: To analyze the relationship between radiological alignment and gait symmetry in patients who underwent unilateral uncemented THR. Materials and Methods: Forty-five patients (mean age: 28.3 ± 3.1 years; 71.1% male) with 1-year follow-up after uncemented THR were assessed. Harris hip score (HHS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis (WOMAC) scores, and radiological parameters (femoral offset, neck-shaft angle, version) were recorded. Gait analysis was performed using 3D motion capture, evaluating stride time, step width, stride length, and step length across operated, non-operated, and normal limbs. Results: Radiological alignment was satisfactory (offset: 32.93 ± 4.30 mm; neck-shaft angle: 130.64° ± 4.60°; version: 17.02° ± 1.37°). HHS and WOMAC were 70.24 ± 2.77 and 17.71 ± 1.00, respectively. Despite these, stride time was significantly longer in the operated limb (1.20 ± 0.02 s) than in nonoperated (1.18 ± 0.00 s) and normal limbs (1.10 ± 0.00 s, P < 0.0001). Step width was greater bilaterally (0.14 ± 0.01 m) compared to normal (0.08 ± 0.01 m, P < 0.0001). Stride length and step length were not significantly different. Conclusion: Functional gait recovery lags behind anatomical alignment after THR. Persistent gait asymmetries highlight the need for integrating biomechanical evaluation with radiological outcomes in post-THR care.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Akram et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0d5025f03e14405aa9bd40https://doi.org/10.4103/jotr.jotr_53_25
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper