PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 20, 2026American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine0 citations

C24-05 Neutropenic Sepsis Is Associated With a Distinct Circulating Host Response Signature in Multiple Prospective Cohorts of Sepsis

View Full Paper
AHA S HartlageSTS TripathiDFD Filippini

Key Points

  • This research aims to characterize how neutropenia affects the immunobiological response in sepsis through plasma protein biomarkers.
  • Analyzed plasma protein biomarkers from three cohorts: VALID (N=1133), MARS (N=1396), and CLOVERS (N=1552) of critically ill patients.
  • Defined neutropenia as a leukocyte count ≤1000/µL and used PCA for group differentiation.
  • Conducted statistical tests, including Wilcoxon rank-sum and Chi-square tests, to compare biomarker concentrations and hyperinflammatory phenotype prevalence.
  • Neutropenic patients had significantly lower leukocyte counts compared to non-neutropenic patients, ranging from 257-469/µL vs. 14,438-16,712/µL respectively.
  • Inflammatory mediators such as IL-6, IL-8, and IL-10 were significantly higher in neutropenic patients (p<0.001 for all).
  • Neutropenic patients also showed a higher prevalence of the hyperinflammatory phenotype (58-96% vs. 22-38%; p<0.001).

Abstract

Abstract Rationale Neutropenic sepsis is a life-threatening condition associated with high rates of morbidity and mortality relative to non-neutropenic populations. Targeted therapies to modulate the host response are needed, however very little is understood of how neutropenia alters sepsis immunobiology. Here, we compared plasma protein biomarker levels between neutropenic and non-neutropenic septic patients with the aim of characterizing neutropenia-specific dysregulated responses. Methods Baseline plasma protein biomarkers from two observational cohorts (VALID; n = 1133, MARS; n = 1396) and one randomized clinical trial (CLOVERS, n = 1552) of critically ill patients with sepsis were analyzed by neutropenic status. Biomarkers associated with systemic inflammation and endothelial activation were chosen for analysis. Since differential cell counts were unavailable, neutropenia was defined as a minimum leukocyte count ≤1000/µL, which is consistent with prior work and has a high specificity for severe neutropenia. To visualize potential group differences, principal component analysis (PCA) plots were constructed from log-transformed data. Untransformed biomarker concentrations were compared using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. Finally, the proportion of patients with the previously assigned hyperinflammatory phenotype, determined through latent class analysis, were compared using the Chi-square test. As a sensitivity analysis, we repeated the above analyses to include a neutropenic definition of leukocyte count ≤1500/µL. Results A total of 47 (4.1%), 60 (4.3%), and 72 (4.6%) patients met our definition for neutropenia in VALID, MARS, and CLOVERS, respectively. Mean leukocyte counts ranged from 257-469/µL in neutropenic patients and 14,438-16,712/µL in non-neutropenic patients. Across all three cohorts, neutropenia was associated with a distinct protein biomarker signature as evidenced by visual PCA data separation (Figure1 A-C, left panels). At the individual biomarker level, neutropenic patients displayed consistently higher concentrations of inflammatory mediators, including interleukin (IL)-6, IL-8, IL-10 (p 0.001 for all), and soluble tumor necrosis factor receptor-1 (p≤0.011) (Figure1 A-C, right panels). Conversely, concentrations of angiopoietin (ANG)-1 (p 0.001), e-Selectin (p 0.001), and p-Selectin (p 0.001) were lower in neutropenic patients. No consistent trend was observed for ANG-2 or intercellular adhesion molecule-1. The hyperinflammatory phenotype was more frequent amongst neutropenic patients compared to non-neutropenic patients (58-96% vs 22-38%; p 0.001). These findings were consistent in sensitivity analyses that expanded the definition of neutropenia to a leukocyte count ≤1500/µL. Conclusions Compared to non-neutropenic patients, those with neutropenic sepsis exhibit a stronger proinflammatory biomarker profile, lower markers of endothelial activation, and a higher prevalence of the hyperinflammatory phenotype. These findings suggest that neutropenic sepsis represents a distinct biological subgroup warranting consideration in future trials testing immunomodulatory therapies. This abstract is funded by: R35HL177135 (CSC), R01HL126176 (LBW), K01HL157755 (VEK), R01HL173531 (PS), R35GM142992 (PS)

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Hartlage et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0d5051f03e14405aa9bfadhttps://doi.org/10.1093/ajrccm/aamag162.6203
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Distinct functional neutrophil phenotypes in sepsis patients correlate with disease severity2024 · 6 citations
  2. 2Identification of novel sepsis-related neutrophil subsets and surface markers for clinical diagnosis and outcome2026
  3. 3Patient stratification using plasma cytokines and their regulators in sepsis: relationship to outcomes, treatment effect and leucocyte transcriptomic subphenotypes2024 · 29 citations
  4. 4Mass cytometry reveals complex neutrophil heterogeneity in patients with severe sepsis2026
  5. 5Integrated multi-omics and artificial intelligence to explore new neutrophils clusters and potential biomarkers in sepsis with experimental validation2024 · 14 citations