PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 20, 2026International Journal of Dental Hygiene0 citationsOpen Access

Effectiveness of Toothbrush Containing Solar Cells and Titanium Dioxide Rod on Plaque Reduction During Caregiver‐Performed Toothbrushing—Randomised Crossover Clinical Trial

View Full Paper
JMJumpei MurakamiMNMai Niida

Key Points

  • The study aims to evaluate the efficacy of a titanium dioxide toothbrush in reducing plaque during caregiver-performed oral hygiene for elderly residents.
  • Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover trial
  • Participants: 40 nursing home residents in Japan with at least one remaining tooth
  • Two 2-week intervention periods with a 2-week washout using TiO2 and placebo toothbrushes
  • Average plaque index with TiO2 toothbrush was 5.9% (95% CI: 3.9–8.0) vs. 10.4% (95% CI: 6.1–14.8) with placebo, p = 0.032
  • Significant difference in plaque reduction between the TiO2 and placebo brush
  • No significant adverse events reported in either group

Abstract

ABSTRACT Objectives This study was conducted to assess the effectiveness of a toothbrush containing solar cells and a titanium dioxide electrode (TiO 2 toothbrush) compared with a normal toothbrush for removing plaque during caregiver‐performed oral hygiene care for elderly residents in nursing homes who require care. Methods A randomised, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled crossover trial was conducted, which consisted of two 2‐week intervention periods separated by a 2‐week washout period. Participants were residents of a nursing home in Japan and met the eligibility criteria of at least one remaining tooth and not using an internal electronic device. Each underwent toothbrushing with either a TiO 2 or a placebo toothbrush. The study aimed to assess the effectiveness of caregiver‐performed toothbrushing, with the Rustogi Modification Navy Plaque Index (RMNPI) as the primary outcome measure. Toothbrushes were randomly assigned to the participants. The allocation process was double‐blinded, with the findings not revealed to the participants, intervention implementers or outcome assessors until after the trial. Results The randomised sample included 40 participants and analysis was conducted using a linear mixed‐effects model. The average plaque index with use of a TiO 2 toothbrush was 5.9% (95% CI: 3.9–8.0) and with a placebo was 10.4% (95% CI: 6.1–14.8), a statistically significant difference ( p = 0.032). No significant adverse events or side effects in either group were reported. Conclusions Caregiver‐performed toothbrushing with a toothbrush designed to exhibit photocatalytic effects and chemical reactions demonstrated superior plaque removal efficacy compared to a normal toothbrush. These findings suggest potential benefits for elderly individuals requiring care and may reduce the burden of oral hygiene care in nursing facilities.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Murakami et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0d5064f03e14405aa9c187https://doi.org/10.1111/idh.70095
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1A novel toothbrush with a thin-head, slender-neck and super-tapered bristles enhancing accessibility in hard-to-reach areas: a crossover randomized trial2024 · 2 citations
  2. 2A Randomized Crossover Clinical Trial Investigating 16‐Branched Filament Toothbrush Effects on Dental Plaque Removal2025
  3. 3Evaluation of dental plaque reduction using microcurrent-emitting toothbrushes in orthodontic patients: a randomized, double-blind, crossover clinical trial2024 · 2 citations
  4. 4Effects of Regular Dual‐Light Antibacterial Photodynamic Therapy on Oral Health in Assisted Living Residents—A Randomized Controlled Trial2026
  5. 5Plaque Reduction Efficacy of an Advanced Electric Toothbrush Compared with a Manual Toothbrush Among 6‐ to 10‐Year‐Old Children: Results From a 4‐Week Randomised Controlled Trial2026