PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 20, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Quantum Computers as Substrate-Interface Devices: Decoherence Anomalies as K-Kernel Stress Signatures

View Full Paper
ABAugusto Bartolomeu

Key Points

  • To explore the anomalies in quantum hardware that arise when operated far from equilibrium and their implications for quantum computing.
  • Presented a three-layer structure: observational case, empirical predictions, and theoretical interpretation.
  • Derived five pre-registered, falsifiable predictions from observed quantum phenomena.
  • Introduced the Multi-Simulation Thesis and proposed the K kernel as a computational substrate.
  • Identified a systematic cluster of anomalous phenomena including time crystals and thermal law violations.
  • Predictions indicate operational boundaries reflecting physical structure rather than mere coincidence.
  • Emphasized the importance of cross-registered prediction targeting new empirical data.

Abstract

This paper is organized in three distinct layers, each with a different epistemological status. Readers are invited to evaluate each layer independently. Part I presents an observational case: quantum hardware, when operated far from equilibrium, produces a systematic cluster of anomalous physical phenomena, time crystals, exotic topological phases, thermal law violations, and measurable entanglement timescales. Each anomaly has a domain-specific conventional explanation. The structural observation is the cluster: these phenomena share a common operational boundary, appear conditionally at the same threshold, and were not predicted by the quantum computing performance narrative. Part II presents an empirical program: five pre-registered, falsifiable predictions derived from the structural observation that quantum processors operate on unresolved probability amplitudes rather than resolved states. The predictions specify what the operational boundary should look like if the anomaly cluster reflects physical structure rather than coincidence. Part III presents the Multi-Simulation Thesis as a candidate theoretical interpretation of Parts I and II. The K kernel, a proposed computational substrate underlying physical reality, is offered as the candidate explanation for why the boundary has the structure Parts I and II document. Part III is labeled as interpretation. Parts I and II are evaluable without accepting it.The 5Hz/200ms cross-registered prediction is an open empirical target. Researchers with access to relevant quantum coherence or gravimetric data are invited to correspond. bartolomeu.mst@gmail.com

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Augusto Bartolomeu (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0d5064f03e14405aa9c288https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20276876
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Substrate Logistics: The Architecture of Quantum Information2026
  2. 2Structured dephasing from a massive scalar memory field: exact treatment, model-selection pitfalls, exclusion limits, and two kinematic signatures2026
  3. 3The Impossible Middle - Operator-Real, Scalar-Invisible Quantum Structure on the Coprime Substrate: the Scalar-Blindness Theorem, its Additive-Multiplicative Source, a Topology-Payload Decoupling, and Reductions to Practice on Copyable Exact Data2026
  4. 4P24: Quantum Computing and the Missing Physics Causing Delays and Overspend: Real Unknown Constraints, Critical Predictions, and a Blueprint for Progress2026
  5. 5Do not read or download this publication.2026