PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 20, 2026Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics0 citations

Intraoperative Hip Arthrography to Guide Decision-Making in Cerebral Palsy Hip Reconstruction

View Full Paper
LPLennert R. PlasschaertCWColyn J. WatkinsPMPatricia E. Miller

Key Points

  • Evaluate the impact of intraoperative hip arthrography on surgical decision-making in children with cerebral palsy undergoing hip reconstruction.
  • Retrospective analysis of 154 children with cerebral palsy (204 hips) from 2011 to 2024.
  • Comparison of outcomes for those undergoing intraoperative hip arthrography from 2016 to 2024 vs. those who did not.
  • Statistical analyses included χ² tests, t tests, and generalized estimating equations for adjusting confounders.
  • Intraoperative hip arthrography reduced the rate of pelvic osteotomy from 82% to 48% (P=0.001).
  • Failure rates were similar between cohorts, with 6.3% for IHA and 8.7% for NIHA (P=0.59).
  • Propensity-score-matched analysis showed equivalent results in pelvic osteotomy performance (57% IHA vs. 75% NIHA, P=0.03).

Abstract

Background: Hip reconstruction surgery is indicated in nonambulatory children with cerebral palsy (CP). The decision to perform a pelvic osteotomy (PO) with a proximal femoral varus derotational osteotomy (VDRO) is subjective. Our hypothesis was that evaluation of dynamic stability and labral pathoanatomy using intraoperative hip arthrography (IHA) would reduce the performance of concomitant PO without adversely affecting outcomes. The capability of IHA to correctly guide intraoperative decision-making was evaluated using midterm outcomes in children with CP (CwCP) treated with hip reconstruction. Methods: Single-surgeon, retrospective analysis of 154 CwCP (204 hips) undergoing hip reconstruction from 2011 to 2024, stratified by those who underwent IHA (IHA: 2016 to 2024) during the index surgery versus those who did not (NIHA: 2011 to 2016). IHA indicated the need for a PO after VDRO, based on labrum orientation and medial dye pooling. Characteristics were compared using χ 2 tests, t tests, and Mann-Whitney U tests, as appropriate. Radiographic outcomes and failure rates (hip resubluxation) >2 years after the index procedure were compared between cohorts, leveraging generalized estimating equations (GEE) modeling and propensity-score-matched (PSM) analyses, adjusting for confounding characteristics. Results: IHA reduced the rate of PO from 82% to 48%, for a 34% reduction, and this was clinically significant ( P =0.001). All hips with upsloping labrums underwent PO, 92% of hips with medial dye-pool underwent PO, whereas downsloping labrums were protective of PO (88.5% underwent VDRO alone). Ten hips failed at a median of 6 years (range: 2.0 to 9.0); however, there were no differences based on ±IHA (GEE-adjusted likelihood of failure 6.3% IHA vs. 8.7% NIHA, P =0.59) or ±PO (6.9% + PO vs. 8.0% VDRO alone, P =0.81). Results of the PSM cohort were equivalent for PO performance (57% IHA vs. 75% NIHA, P =0.03), failure rates, and radiographic outcomes. Conclusions: For patients with CP undergoing hip reconstruction, evaluation of dynamic stability and labral pathoanatomy using IHA reduced the performance of concomitant PO without adversely affecting outcomes. Failures were unrelated to ±IHA or ±PO, suggesting other factors, such as unmitigated hypertonia and/or spinal deformity, were provocative. Level of Evidence: Level III—retrospective comparative study.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Plasschaert et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0d5078f03e14405aa9c409https://doi.org/10.1097/bpo.0000000000003327
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper