PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 20, 2026American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine0 citations

D96-06 Novel Computed Tomography (CT) Mucus Scores Explain Reduced Lung Function in Cystic Fibrosis

View Full Paper
DGD GeorgiadesAMA M MathesonJWJ C Woods

Key Points

  • This study aims to evaluate a new CT scoring system that quantifies mucus plugging in cystic fibrosis and its correlation with lung function metrics.
  • CT scans and Xe-MRI were analyzed from 21 cystic fibrosis patients with IRB approval.
  • Mucus plug data were categorized by bronchopulmonary segments, and CT mucus scores were calculated: Nplugs, Nseg, and %Volobs.
  • Statistical analyses included Wilcoxon tests for group differences and Spearman correlation for relationships.
  • Patients with high %Volobs (>8.5) had significantly lower FEV1 scores (median=85.0) compared to low mucus group (median=102.0; p=0.03).
  • %Volobs showed a significant correlation with FEV1 (ρ=-0.597, p=0.007).
  • All mucus scores positively correlated with Xe VDP, with %Volobs at (ρ=0.845, p=0.002).

Abstract

Abstract Rationale Airway mucus plugging is an early manifestation of cystic fibrosis (CF) lung disease that obstructs airflow and facilitates local inflammation and infection, leading to permanent lung damage. Computed tomography (CT) is the gold-standard for assessing pulmonary structural abnormalities including mucus plugging; however, current lobe-based CT scoring systems often miss subtle changes typical of mild CF1. We hypothesize that a novel scoring system that quantifies mucus plugging by bronchopulmonary segment and generation will more precisely quantify the underlying pathophysiology of CF and will correlate well with clinical metrics like forced expiratory volume (FEV1) and ventilation defect percent (VDP) from Xe-MRI. Methods Xe-MRI and retrospective review of clinically-obtained CTs were performed with IRB approval. Xe-MRI was analyzed using standard software to calculate VDP. Individual mucus plugs were identified and assigned to bronchopulmonary segment and generation. These data were used to calculate 3 CT mucus scores: total number of plugs (Nplugs), total number of segments with any plug (Nseg), and percent lung volume obstructed by mucus (%Volobs), using each plug’s subtended volume percentage of total lung volume. Group differences were analyzed using Wilcoxon tests and relationships by Spearman correlation Results CT scans from 21 CF patients were analyzed (mean age 11.8±4.4 yrs). 19 had FEV1 obtained within two months of CT (FEV1=93±13%), and 11 had MRI-derived VDP data within three months (VDP=14.1±7.6). Mucus score averages for all patients were as follows: Nplugs=38±50; Nseg=7.0±4.5 and %Volobs=9.0±6.9%. Patients with high %Volobs (defined as %Volobs8.5, mean %Volobs) had significantly lower FEV1 scores (median=85.0) compared with the low mucus group (median=102.0; p = 0.03). %Volobs also correlated with FEV1 (ρ= -0.597, p = 0.007). All mucus scores demonstrated strong positive associations with Xe VDP: %Volobs (ρ = 0.845, p = 0.002), Nplugs (ρ = 0.736, p = 0.01), and Nseg (ρ = 0.648, p = 0.03). Importantly, %Volobs in mild patients (defined as FEV1 80,) also showed significant correlation with VDP (ρ = 0.833, p = 0.008; n = 9) and FEV1 (ρ=-0.497, p = 0.04; n = 17). Conclusion Precise mucus scores are significantly associated with lung function and regional ventilation defects in CF. While prior studies have linked mucus scores (Nseg and Nplugs) to clinical outcomes in pulmonary diseases such as asthma2, this work extends these scores to CF and introduces %Volobs as a more precise metric. These findings suggest that CT-based mucus scoring could provide clinically meaningful quantification of disease burden in CF, and %Volobs may offer a transferable framework for assessing airway obstruction across pulmonary diseases. References 1.Thia et al. Thorax(2014). 2.Dunican et al. JCI(2018). This abstract is funded by: CF Foundation and NIH

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Georgiades et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0d50bdf03e14405aa9cca0https://doi.org/10.1093/ajrccm/aamag162.2194
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Computed tomography mucus plugs and airway tree structure in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: Associations with airflow limitation, health‐related independence and mortality2024 · 26 citations
  2. 2D13-09 Mucus Plugging and Its Associations With Mucin Concentrations, Symptoms, Smoking Burden, and Chronic Bronchitis in Early COPD: SOURCE Cohort Analysis2026
  3. 3D96-04 CT-Evaluated Mucus Plugging in Sputum Cellular Phenotypes of Severe Asthma2026
  4. 4Mucus plugs: a core pathophysiological mechanism in COPD and a potential imaging biomarker of disease activity2026
  5. 5A16-04 Significance of Mucus Plugs in Early COPD: An Analysis of the SOURCE Cohort2026