PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 20, 2026American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine0 citations

A37-03 Phinding Hope: The Growth and Analysis of the Novel Pulmonary Hypertension Screening Program (phind Clinic)

View Full Paper
TTT TharpAGA GulianiGKG B Kuzmishin

Key Points

  • This analysis aims to evaluate the performance and growth of the Pulmonary Hypertension Screening Program (PHIND Clinic) in 2025 to enhance the diagnosis of precapillary pulmonary hypertension.
  • Automated screening of outpatient transthoracic echocardiograms (TTEs) for high probability pulmonary hypertension (PH) criteria across regional hospitals (N=1,156).
  • Referral to a pulmonary hypertension consultation for patients meeting the high probability criteria.
  • Data collection occurred from February 2025 to July 2025.
  • 48 TTEs met the criteria for high probability PH with a referral to a pulmonary hypertension provider.
  • 20 patients attended the PHIND Clinic with a 58% consultation rate, average age 68.3 years.
  • 40% of referred patients underwent right heart catheterization, with 75% confirmed to have precapillary PH; 50% of these patients started on therapy.

Abstract

Abstract Rationale Precapillary pulmonary hypertension(PH) carries significant morbidity and mortality, yet diagnosis remains delayed due to nonspecific symptoms and limited provider awareness. Prior analysis from our institution demonstrated that elevated right ventricular systolic pressure(RVSP) and right ventricular(RV) dysfunction on transthoracic echocardiogram(TTE) often go unaddressed, delaying referral to PH specialists. To address this, the Pulmonary Hypertension Screening Program(PHIND Clinic) was developed to automate the detection of potential PH on routine echocardiograms within several regional hospitals within the Cleveland Clinic Enterprise and prompt specialty referral to a PH provider. This analysis evaluates the continued performance and growth of the PHIND program in 2025. Methods All outpatient TTEs performed across regional hospitals within the Cleveland Clinic Enterprise were automatically screened for the presence of high probability PH defined as either elevated tricuspid regurgitant jet velocity (TRV) 3.4 m/s, TRV 2.9-3.4 m/s and evidence of right heart failure, or unreported TRV with evidence of right heart failure- all with the exclusion of left sided heart disease. A PH consultation was subsequently recommended for all patients who met high probability criteria. Data was collected from February 2025 to July 2025; of the pre-selected TTEs screened (1,156 TTEs), 48 patients were deemed high probability and referred to a PH provider (Figure 1). Results During the screening period, 48 TTEs met our criteria for high probability PH. 20 patients were seen in PHIND Clinic (35% female, average age 68.3 years) with a 58% consultation rate. Average time from screened echo to initial PHIND appointment was 77.59 days. 55% of patients only had 1 echo suggestive of PH which prompted a referral. The average time from the first echo suggestive of PH to the PHIND appointment was 365.15 days. 55% of patients had NYHA FC I/II symptoms. 40% underwent RHC with 75% of patients having precapillary PH of which 50% were started on therapy. The PHIND patients had additional pulmonary comorbidities including COPD (35%), morbid obesity (35%), OHS (10%), and CPFE (5%). Overall mortality of the PHIND cohort is 10%. Conclusions Compared to traditional referral pathways, PHIND clinic reduces diagnostic delay and increases recognition of previously overlooked echocardiographic abnormalities. Implementation of an automated, TTE-based screening and referral system successfully improved early identification of precapillary PH. Further improvement is needed including establishing a more thorough assessment of RV on echocardiogram, reduction in time to first appointment, and consideration of lowering our threshold for performing RHCs on this selective population. This abstract is funded by: None

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Tharp et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0d50f3f03e14405aa9d27chttps://doi.org/10.1093/ajrccm/aamag162.5504
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1B41-20 Accuracy of Clinician Suspicion for Pulmonary Hypertension in Interstitial Lung Disease by Care Setting: Interim Comparison From the PHINDER Study2026
  2. 2B23-24 A Scoring System for the Detection of Pulmonary Hypertension in Patients With Interstitial Lung Disease2026
  3. 3C66-13 Missed Signals: Recognition of Pulmonary Hypertension on Echocardiography, a Retrospective Study2026
  4. 4IMproving PULmonary hypertension Screening by Echocardiography: IMPULSE2022 · 16 citations
  5. 5C66-16 Evaluating Non-invasive Predictors of Pre- and Post-capillary Pulmonary Hypertension2026