Thoracoscopic right atrial access for septal lead implantation was successfully performed with stable parameters in a 67-year-old patient lacking conventional venous access.
Case Report
Is thoracoscopic right atrial access feasible for septal lead implantation in a patient without conventional venous access?
A 67-year-old patient with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and left bundle branch block, referred for cardiac resynchronization therapy, with bilateral subclavian venous stenosis and unsuitable coronary sinus lead positioning.
Hybrid thoracoscopic approach for right atrial access and implantation of a septal pacing lead targeting the left bundle branch (LBB) area.
Successful lead placement with satisfactory electrical parameters and uneventful postoperative recovery.
Thoracoscopic right atrial access is a feasible minimally invasive strategy for septal lead implantation in patients lacking conventional venous access.
Abstract Background Transvenous lead implantation remains the standard of cardiac pacing; however, alternative strategies are required in patients with limited or absent venous access. Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) has previously been used for epicardial left ventricular lead placement when transvenous approaches fail. Direct thoracoscopic access to the right atrium for endocardial septal pacing has not been previously described. We report a novel, minimally invasive technique allowing right atrial access and implantation of a septal pacing lead targeting the left bundle branch (LBB) area. Case summary A 67-year-old patient with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and LBB block was referred for cardiac resynchronization therapy. Conventional transvenous CRT implantation was unsuccessful due to bilateral subclavian venous stenosis and unsuitable coronary sinus lead positioning with high pacing thresholds and phrenic nerve stimulation. Surgical epicardial lead placement was considered high risk because of extensive intrathoracic adhesions following previous oesophageal surgery. A hybrid thoracoscopic approach was therefore pursued. Under general anaesthesia with single-lung ventilation, three 5 mm thoracoscopic ports were inserted on the right anterior thorax. After pericardial opening, a purse-string suture was placed on the right atrium, allowing introduction of a 7–9 Fr sheath using the Seldinger technique. Under fluoroscopic and electrophysiologic guidance, a pacing lead was advanced and positioned in the LBB area. Satisfactory electrical parameters were achieved. Postoperative recovery was uneventful, and device interrogation at follow-up demonstrated stable lead parameters and effective ventricular pacing. Discussion Thoracoscopic right atrial access may represent a feasible minimally invasive strategy for septal lead implantation in patients without conventional venous access. This hybrid surgical-electrophysiological technique allows direct atrial visualization while enabling endocardial conduction system pacing. Although this initial experience demonstrates technical feasibility and procedural safety, further experience and long-term follow-up are required to determine the reproducibility and durability of this approach.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Evelyne Verhulst
Elise Bakelants
Filip Haenen
European Heart Journal - Case Reports
Imelda Hospital
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Verhulst et al. (Thu,) conducted a case report in Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and LBB block (n=1). Thoracoscopic right atrial access for septal lead implantation was evaluated on Technical feasibility and procedural safety (successful lead implantation and satisfactory electrical parameters). Thoracoscopic right atrial access for septal lead implantation was successfully performed with stable parameters in a 67-year-old patient lacking conventional venous access.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0ea17cbe05d6e3efb60334 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjcr/ytag319
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: