The necessity for strong cybersecurity governance frameworks that can strike a balance between legal compliance, ethical responsibility, and technical resilience has been magnified by the rapid development of digital technologies and AI. There is a lack of cohesion among current cybersecurity approaches, with the legal, ethical, and technical domains functioning independently. This leads to inconsistencies in regulation and weaknesses in implementation. An all-encompassing framework that integrates these aspects into a consistent framework to strengthen cybersecurity policy, ethical responsibility, and technical resilience is presented in this study as the Integrated Cybersecurity Governance Model (ICGM). To find out what areas of governance are lacking and what new ethical and regulatory problems are coming up with cybersecurity systems that are driven by artificial intelligence, 50 peer-reviewed publications published between 2020 and 2025 are studied. The proposed ICGM empirically supported through a multi-stakeholder survey involving 500 participants, including academics, industry professionals, and government officials. The model’s validity and adaptability are reinforced by statistical tests, such as reliability testing (α = 0.87) and ANOVA, which indicate substantial differences in views of legal compliance, ethical standards, and operational resilience across sectors. Findings show that the ICGM improves cybersecurity decision-making by giving practical ways to incorporate AI ethics (e.g. openness, justice, and responsibility) at operational and policy levels, also ICGM adoption leads to better proactive threat management, ethical alignment, and compliance assurance. The paper wraps up with policy suggestions for bringing together new ethical AI frameworks with existing international cybersecurity laws like the General Data Protection Regulation and the Budapest Convention. In sum, the ICGM lays the groundwork for future studies and practical applications in digital infrastructure governance, all of which contribute to the growth of cybersecurity ecosystems that are resilient, morally based, and legally compliant.
Ababneh et al. (2026) studied this question.