Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
The rapid development of artificial intelligence (AI) and Generative AI (GenAI) based on large language models (LLMs) is reshaping teaching practices, assessment criteria, and ethical questions regarding authenticity, source reliability, and educational responsibility. Understanding teachers’ attitudes toward AI is crucial for identifying acceptance, resistance, and professional development needs. This study aimed to adapt and validate, for the Italian context, the questionnaire developed by Alsudairy and Eltantawy for assessing teachers’ attitudes toward AI in education, and to explore attitudinal differences according to selected socio-professional variables. A convenience sample of 682 in-service teachers from different school levels and Italian regions completed the 36-item questionnaire on a 3-point Likert scale. Exploratory factor analysis suggested an interpretable two-factor structure, although some items showed weak, non-salient, or cross-loadings. A confirmatory factor analysis conducted on a refined 32-item ordinal model supported a correlated two-factor solution with good global fit indices. However, the strong correlation between the two latent factors and the presence of selected weak indicators suggest that further refinement and cross-validation are needed. Educational attainment was the only socio-professional variable significantly associated with attitudes toward AI, although the effect size was small. Post hoc analyses showed a significant difference between teachers holding a postgraduate Master’s degree and those holding only a high school diploma, whereas other differences should be interpreted as descriptive trends. Taken together, these findings provide preliminary support for the Italian adaptation of the instrument and offer initial insight into the role of professional characteristics in shaping teachers’ attitudes toward AI in educational settings.
Fiorucci et al. (Sun,) studied this question.