PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 25, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Real-world evidence of the efficacy and safety of first-line chemotherapy gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel for elderly patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer

View Full Paper
AAAgata Adamczuk-NurzyńskaPNPaweł NurzyńskiMBMelania Brzozowska

Key Points

  • The study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel in elderly patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer.
  • Retrospective analysis of 245 patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer treated with GEM-NAB.
  • 143 patients (58.4%) aged ≥ 65 years were included.
  • Data collected on progression-free survival and overall survival, along with adverse events.
  • Median progression-free survival was 6.07 months (95% CI: 5.24–6.89).
  • Median overall survival was 9.33 months (95% CI: 8.64–10.03).
  • Dose modifications were needed in 69.2% of cases due to adverse events, with no significant differences in safety profile between age groups.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Metastatic pancreatic cancer (mPC) is a highly aggressive disease associated with elevated rates of morbidity and mortality, and long-term survival remains poor. New therapeutic options, such as gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (GEM-NAB), demonstrate statistically significant improvements in both overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Evidence-based data regarding the management of mPC in the elderly population remain limited. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This retrospective study analyzed a total of 245 patients with mPC treated with first-line GEM-NAB between February 2017 and January 2025. Of these, 143 (58.4%) were aged ≥ 65 years, including 88 (61.5%) women and 55 (38.5%) men. RESULTS: The median PFS was 6.07 months (95% CI: 5.24–6.89), and the median OS was 9.33 months (95% CI 8.64–10.03). The most common adverse events (AEs) were anemia, fatigue, neutropenia, peripheral neu­ropathy, and thrombocytopenia. No significant differences in the safety profile were observed between the older and younger patient groups; notably, the incidence of grade 4 toxicities was comparable. Dose modifications were required in 69.2% of cases to effectively manage AEs. Alcohol consumption and CEA levels were identified as independent prognostic factors for both OS and PFS. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings demonstrate that GEM-NAB is a safe and effective regimen for elderly patients in good clinical condition. Proactive dose modifications are essential to maintain treatment tolerability without compromising efficacy.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Adamczuk-Nurzyńska et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a13e7a80e02ee3982d32573https://doi.org/10.5603/ocp.111020
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Real-World Evidence of the Efficacy and Safety of Second-Line Therapy After Gemcitabine and Nab-Paclitaxel for Patients with Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer2025
  2. 2Efficacy of Gemcitabine Plus Nab-paclitaxel in Second-line Treatment of Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer: a Multicenter Retrospective Study in Turkey2024
  3. 3A randomized phase II study of gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel compared with 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, and liposomal irinotecan in older patients with treatment-naïve metastatic pancreatic cancer (GIANT): ECOG-ACRIN EA2186.2024 · 11 citations
  4. 4Post hoc subgroup analysis of neoadjuvant gemcitabine plus S1 vs gemcitabine plus nab paclitaxel in elderly resectable/borderline resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma2025
  5. 5A Retrospective Study of Gemcitabine Plus Nab-Paclitaxel for Advanced Pancreatic Cancer Refractory to Gemcitabine Monotherapy2024 · 4 citations