PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 25, 2026Gastric Cancer0 citationsOpen Access

Circulating tumor DNA-guided response evaluation in patients with previously treated gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma

CICecilie Riis IdenNØNadia ØgaardSMSalah Mohammad Mustafa

Key Points

  • This study aims to assess the prognostic value of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) for treatment monitoring in gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma.
  • Retrospective analysis of a randomized Phase 2 trial
  • Baseline and on-treatment plasma samples collected at weeks 4 and 8
  • ctDNA quantified using methylation-specific digital droplet PCR (ddPCR)
  • Patients with high baseline ctDNA (top 20%) had shorter progression-free survival (PFS; median 1.8 vs. 4.6 months; HR 2.2, p = 0.005)
  • Overall survival (OS) was also shorter for high baseline ctDNA (median 5.5 vs. 9.9 months; HR 2.2, p = 0.004)
  • Early progression by ctDNA at four weeks was associated with inferior OS (HR 2.4, p = 0.003)

Abstract

Abstract Background Systemic treatment offers only modest survival benefits in previously treated metastatic gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma (GEA). Treatment monitoring using imaging-based response assessments are often delayed and imprecise, highlighting the need for biomarkers to guide early treatment decisions. We evaluated the value of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) for prognosis, patient selection, and on-treatment monitoring in patients with previously treated GEA. Methods This retrospective study aimed to investigate whether baseline ctDNA levels and early ctDNA changes assessed by ctDNA-RECIST were associated with survival outcomes in a randomized Phase 2 trial comparing trifluridine-tipiracil plus bevacizumab or trifluridine-tipiracil alone. Plasma samples were collected at baseline and during treatment (weeks 4 and 8). ctDNA was quantified by a tumor-agnostic methylation-specific digital droplet PCR (ddPCR) assay. Results Plasma samples were available in 86 patients out of a total of 103 patients included in the trial. Patients with the highest baseline ctDNA levels (top 20%, n = 18) had significantly shorter progression-free survival (PFS; median 1.8 vs. 4.6 months; HR 2.2, p = 0.005) and overall survival (OS; median 5.5 vs. 9.9 months; HR 2.2, p = 0.004) compared to those with lower levels. Early progression by ctDNA at four weeks (HR 2.4, p = 0.003) and at eight weeks by radiological assessment (HR 2.9, p = 0.001) were both associated with inferior OS. Conclusions ctDNA is a strong prognostic biomarker in refractory GEA. High baseline levels and early increases identify patients unlikely to benefit from treatment. Prospective validation is needed, but ctDNA monitoring may enable earlier therapeutic decision-making in clinical practice.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Iden et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a13e7a80e02ee3982d325d9https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-026-01743-w
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Circulating tumor DNA predicts recurrence and survival in patients with resectable gastric and gastroesophageal junction cancer2024 · 30 citations
  2. 2New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: Revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1)2008 · 30,019 citations
  3. 3Novel DNA methylation biomarkers show high sensitivity and specificity for blood-based detection of colorectal cancer—a clinical biomarker discovery and validation study2019 · 148 citations
  4. 4ctDNA-Response evaluation criteria in solid tumors – a new measure in medical oncology2022 · 37 citations
  5. 5Short interval circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) kinetics as a predictor of tumor response in patients with gastrointestinal (GI) cancer receiving immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based treatment.2025 · 1 citations