PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 25, 2026Journal of Academic Ethics0 citationsOpen Access

Strategies to Promote Academic Integrity in Undergraduate Medical Education: A scoping Review of Global Evidence

JPJuan Manuel Naranjo PiñerosJMJuan José Villamarín MarrugoERErwin Hernando Hernández Rincón

Key Points

  • The aim is to summarize evidence on promoting academic integrity in undergraduate medical education.
  • Conducted a systematic search in PubMed, Scopus, and ERIC
  • Followed Arksey and O’Malley’s framework and PRISMA-ScR guidelines
  • Charted and analyzed studies through narrative synthesis.
  • Most interventions improved students' knowledge, attitudes, or perceptions regarding academic integrity
  • Common issues included plagiarism and exam cheating
  • Interventions varied widely and lacked rigorous long-term evaluation.

Abstract

Abstract Upholding academic integrity during medical training is essential to the development of ethical and professional physicians. Yet, academic dishonesty remains a global concern in medical schools, with implications for both academic and clinical practice. This scoping review mapped and summarized evidence on interventions promoting academic integrity among undergraduate medical students. Following Arksey and O’Malley’s framework and PRISMA-ScR guidelines, a systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, and ERIC. Eligible studies were charted and analyzed through narrative synthesis. The included studies described three main types of measures: curricular interventions, modifications to assessment methods, and institutional strategies. Most showed improvements in students’ knowledge, attitudes, or perceptions of academic integrity, particularly regarding plagiarism and exam cheating. However, interventions were heterogeneous, context-specific, and rarely included long-term follow-up or rigorous evaluation. Promoting academic integrity in medical education requires comprehensive, context-adapted approaches integrating curricular innovations, fair assessment reforms, and sustained institutional policies. Despite positive short-term outcomes, major gaps persist in standardized pedagogical frameworks, longitudinal evaluation, and evidence on sustainability. Future research should prioritize systematic and culturally sensitive strategies to ensure the ethical formation of future physicians.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Piñeros et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a13e7cf0e02ee3982d32713https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-026-09742-3
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Reasons for academic cheating in a cohort of nursing students in Saudi Arabia: a cross-sectional study2024 · 2 citations
  2. 2Is it OK if I cheat? Implementation of, and student response to, iterative change in an undergraduate medical degree high stakes OSCE due to issues of academic integrity2024 · 2 citations
  3. 3Perception of medical students on plagiarism in RAK Medical and Health Sciences University, Ras Al Khaimah, UAE2024 · 2 citations
  4. 4PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation2018 · 43,368 citations
  5. 5Security Considerations and Recommendations in Computer-Based Testing2014 · 37 citations